Introduction: Histories of the Gift and Desire

Alvis, Jason W.

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-27942-8_1

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Extending this to relational philanthropy means understanding that philanthropy likewise pulls from economics whereby by a reciprocol exchange of resources between grantors and grantees creates meaningful grantmaking. Assuming that philanthroy is an exchange challenges the view that giftgiving is primarialy an altruistic, one‐directional act—an idea long explored in postmodern debates on whether gifts are truly ‘free’, (Derrida, 1992; Bourdieu, 1997; Adloff, 2006; Alvis, 2016; Olson, 2002; Sigaud, 2002) Mauss (1990 [1924]) laid the groundwork for this argument in his seminal ethnography The Gift. Seen as system of ‘total prestation’, reciprocity across networks of actors creates a community‐based gift economy where actors are obliged to give resources and are entitled to receive them from other community members in good faith.…”

Section: Relational Philanthropymentioning

confidence: 99%

In reciprocity, we trust: Improving grantmaking through relational philanthropy

Petzinger,

Jung

2024

Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With a growing emphasis on empowering communities amongst the practices of philanthropic foundations, practitioners recognise the need for giving strategies grounded in communities of practice's contextual and contingent knowledge. This bringing of beneficiaries' lived experiences into grantmaking represents a wider recognition that sees gift‐giving as a dialogical process that uses relationships with community beneficiaries as the point of departure for creating progressive forms of philanthropy, broadly referred to as ‘relational philanthropy’. Foundations that declare themselves as relational funders typically take a more trusting approach by offering more unrestricted, longer‐term funding, simplifying reporting requirements, and empowering grantees to use the resources provided more flexibly. In this paper, we argue that relational philanthropy expresses a form of ‘relational work’, as it possesses a trust‐based character that speaks to the reciprocal power of gift‐giving, whereby both benefactors and beneficiaries receive value from the co‐created, context‐drivengift exchange: beneficiaries receive philanthropic resources (time, treasure, talent, ties) with more control over spending, while the benefactors gain grassroots insights that can inform future funding policies and practices. In this paper, we show that such reciprocity between funders and their beneficiaries is an important step towards empowering communities for three reasons: (1) by strengthening trust in, and sharing power with, their grantees, foundations empower them to engage more thoroughly with their communities; (2) by grantees communicating their community‐level lived experiences to foundations, foundations can develop more informed and relevant grantmaking decisions, and; (3) as reciprocal exchanges are built on trust, this relational philanthropy creates social capital that strengthens relationships and solidarity across civil society.

show abstract