2017
DOI: 10.1080/19369816.2017.1328780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction—object habits: Legacies of fieldwork and the museum

Abstract: This paper introduces the concept of 'object habits' for diversifying the scope of museum histories. The term is shorthand referring to an area's customs relating to objects, taking into account factors that influence the types of things chosen, motivations for collecting, modes of acquisition, temporal variations in procurement, styles of engagements with artefacts or specimens, their treatment, documentation and representation, as well as attitudes to their presentation and reception. These customs emerge no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is during this stage that a heterogeneous network of individuals channels objects towards collections and museums and the exchanges that are undertaken and the different owners, negotiations and concessions that take place, may be identified. 14 In order to find the actors involved and understand how they operated, we positively need to establish and reflect on details which are sometimes found in 'object habits', 15 and in other sources used in the field of the history of disciplines, of institutions and characters shaped by a nationalist context. At the same time, understanding processes of knowledge construction requires a grasp of how the interests of the different players coincide and requires the levelling of the playing field, in the sense that the contribution of no group of actors should be regarded as being more or less important than that of any other.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is during this stage that a heterogeneous network of individuals channels objects towards collections and museums and the exchanges that are undertaken and the different owners, negotiations and concessions that take place, may be identified. 14 In order to find the actors involved and understand how they operated, we positively need to establish and reflect on details which are sometimes found in 'object habits', 15 and in other sources used in the field of the history of disciplines, of institutions and characters shaped by a nationalist context. At the same time, understanding processes of knowledge construction requires a grasp of how the interests of the different players coincide and requires the levelling of the playing field, in the sense that the contribution of no group of actors should be regarded as being more or less important than that of any other.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%