Imperial Migrations 2013
DOI: 10.1057/9781137265005_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Portugal, Empire, and Migrations — Was There Ever an Autonomous Social Imperial Space?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reparaz refused to identify Spain and Portugal with "Europe", which is deemed an adversary, because in his opinion the Iberian nations were not only colonisers but also colonised. This anticipates recent scholarship on the Portuguese "subaltern colonialism" 73 , which argues that the Portuguese empire was dependent in many aspects on the British. This can also match contemporary decolonial scholarship on the "geopolitics of knowledge", stressing the importance of knowledge' places Federico Ferretti & Jacobo Garcia-Alvarez, "Anarchist geopolitics of the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939): Gonzalo de Reparaz and the 'Iberian Tragedy'", Geopolitics 2018, doi 10.1080/14650045.2017.1398143 [forthcoming] and focusing on historical distinctions between Iberian and North-European colonialism in the Americas.…”
Section: "Berberia" "Iberia" and The 1936 Tragedysupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Reparaz refused to identify Spain and Portugal with "Europe", which is deemed an adversary, because in his opinion the Iberian nations were not only colonisers but also colonised. This anticipates recent scholarship on the Portuguese "subaltern colonialism" 73 , which argues that the Portuguese empire was dependent in many aspects on the British. This can also match contemporary decolonial scholarship on the "geopolitics of knowledge", stressing the importance of knowledge' places Federico Ferretti & Jacobo Garcia-Alvarez, "Anarchist geopolitics of the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939): Gonzalo de Reparaz and the 'Iberian Tragedy'", Geopolitics 2018, doi 10.1080/14650045.2017.1398143 [forthcoming] and focusing on historical distinctions between Iberian and North-European colonialism in the Americas.…”
Section: "Berberia" "Iberia" and The 1936 Tragedysupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Baganha () calls this the “Lusophone migratory system,” comprising seven countries, one fairly highly developed (Portugal), three of medium development (Brazil, Angola, Cape Verde), and three with low development levels (São Tomé and Principe, Mozambique, Guinea‐Bissau); these development differentials being essential to the functioning of the system (Baganha, , p. 8). Although some authors contest the notion of an “autonomous Lusophone migratory space” (e.g., Morier‐Genoud & Cahen, ), we go with the majority view of Portuguese geographers and migration scholars that, at least at the descriptive level of migration flows and exchanges, the system “exists” (Baganha, ; Góis & Marques, ; Malheiros, ).…”
Section: Portugal As Semi‐peripherymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Moreover, Coudreau's idea of tropicality, his multilingualism and his direct implication with local politicians prefigure some aspects of what Gilberto Freyre called ‘Lusotropicalism’. According to Eric Morier‐Genoud and Michel Cahen, contemporary myths on Lusophony take their inspiration from ‘the formation of autonomous social spaces of migration’ (Morier‐Genoud & Cahen, : 1) which occurred not within the Portuguese empire, but between Portugal and its former Brazilian colony, including especially European workers. Drawing on Morier‐Genoud's and Cahen's question, ‘were the diasporas in favour or against empire, in favour of or against decolonization?’ (Morier‐Genoud & Cahen : 13), it is possible to argue that the case of Coudreau shows all the problematic nature and ambiguity of migrations in imperial contexts.…”
Section: Unruly Coudreau: Between Counani and Brazilmentioning
confidence: 99%