Richard Rorty
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511613951.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Richard Rorty and Contemporary Philosophy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This temptation might explain the scholarly urge to reduce his normative concerns to a Kantian “‘don’t be cruel’ rule,” despite Rorty’s disdain for universalizable moral mantras (Elshtain 2003, 145; Rorty 1989, 192–93). Others see Rorty’s invitation to consult authors like Nabokov as wanting for readers to “see the ways in which human beings are cruel to one another … in order to become less cruel” (Guignon and Hiley 2003, 26). It is thus worth emphasizing that, for Rorty, the precise point of reading Lolita is not to dissuade us from acting like Humbert Humbert (for such a conclusion should be obvious to us) but rather to show us how we are prone already to think like him 12 .…”
Section: The Cruelty Of Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This temptation might explain the scholarly urge to reduce his normative concerns to a Kantian “‘don’t be cruel’ rule,” despite Rorty’s disdain for universalizable moral mantras (Elshtain 2003, 145; Rorty 1989, 192–93). Others see Rorty’s invitation to consult authors like Nabokov as wanting for readers to “see the ways in which human beings are cruel to one another … in order to become less cruel” (Guignon and Hiley 2003, 26). It is thus worth emphasizing that, for Rorty, the precise point of reading Lolita is not to dissuade us from acting like Humbert Humbert (for such a conclusion should be obvious to us) but rather to show us how we are prone already to think like him 12 .…”
Section: The Cruelty Of Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karl Popper is "among those who have prominently defended science as a model for the conduct of liberal democracy" (Guignon and Hiley, 2003) since he is a thorough-going liberal. There has been much dispute about how his method of science can be brought to bearing in the field of politics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, and notoriously, Rorty advocated consensus‐type accounts of knowledge and truth. As Guignon and Hiley summarize his view, “There is no basis for deciding what counts as knowledge and truth other than what one's peers will let one get away with in open exchange of claims, counterclaims, and reasons” (Guignon and Hiley , p. 11). Consensus also figures prominently in Isaac Levi's brand of pragmatism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%