2015
DOI: 10.1111/deci.12131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to Innovation WITHIN and ACROSS Borders: A Review and Future Directions

Abstract: Innovation is an integral part of every firm's ongoing operations. While new product and service creation is an essential task to ensure a firm's immediate success in the marketplace, process and supply chain innovations can also create a unique source of competitive advantage for the future. Encouraging innovative thinking, developing new innovations, and managing the processes by which those innovations are developed are critical aspects of today's firm. Consequently, research which aids in the creation and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 200 publications
(313 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous project portfolio selection studies are related to the knapsack setting (Fox, Baker, & Bryant, ; Kavadias & Chao, ; Hu & Szmerekovsky, ) addressing problems like selection of automotive (Loch et al., ), aviation (Dickinson et al., ), or pharmaceutical (Girotra, Terwiesch, & Ulrich, ) projects. Depending on technological (Krishnan & Bhattacharya, ), organizational (Mullins, Forlani, & Walker, ), or market (Carrillo, Druehl, & Hsuan, ) circumstances, the outcome of a new project is typically risky. The underlying knapsack problem (Martello & Toth, ) trueprefixmaxx{0,1}IvTx|kTxcconsiders a set of I items, with expected value vdouble-struckR+I and required resources kdouble-struckR+I of each item.…”
Section: Decision Behavior In the Knapsack Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous project portfolio selection studies are related to the knapsack setting (Fox, Baker, & Bryant, ; Kavadias & Chao, ; Hu & Szmerekovsky, ) addressing problems like selection of automotive (Loch et al., ), aviation (Dickinson et al., ), or pharmaceutical (Girotra, Terwiesch, & Ulrich, ) projects. Depending on technological (Krishnan & Bhattacharya, ), organizational (Mullins, Forlani, & Walker, ), or market (Carrillo, Druehl, & Hsuan, ) circumstances, the outcome of a new project is typically risky. The underlying knapsack problem (Martello & Toth, ) trueprefixmaxx{0,1}IvTx|kTxcconsiders a set of I items, with expected value vdouble-struckR+I and required resources kdouble-struckR+I of each item.…”
Section: Decision Behavior In the Knapsack Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the quest of expanding the scope of OM research, we examine potential research opportunities arising in the emerging space industry. We do so in a similar vein to OM research in operations and logistics arising from emerging geographic markets (Iyer, Lee, & Roth, ), global OM (Narasimhan, ), health care operations (Smith‐Daniels, Schweikhart, & Smith‐Daniels, ; Roth et al., ), innovation management processes (Carrillo, Druehl, & Hsuan, ), interdisciplinary work with SCM (Sanders, Zacharia, & Fugate, ), socially responsible operations (Lee & Tang, ), and sustainable SCM (Sarkis, ; Brandenburg, Govindan, Sarkis, & Seuring, ). Singhal, Sodhi, and Tang () summarize the thrust of such research thusly: “To make research still more meaningful for practice and more vibrant, the OM community needs to take proactive steps to ensure our research is driven by practice so that our research can also influence practice.” There are examples where focused, rigorous academic research has led the way and changed how markets operated—such as the economic order quantity formula for inventory management—even if adoption has lagged the discovery in some cases (Erlenkotter, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Tikoo and Nair () develop a model relating franchise royalty rate to optimal sales volume. As franchising entails cross‐boundary governance between firms, renewed interest in the domain is warranted given recent focus on interorganizational arrangements and strategic outcomes (Carrillo et al., ).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focus on two innovativeness outcomes, product and process innovativeness (Carrillo, Druehl, & Hsuan, ; for a more detailed review see Rubera and Kirca, ), measured as the number of product and process innovations, respectively. A product innovation is one that results in the development of a new product (in this case, a menu item) and a process innovation is one that results in a change in the firm's operations, including in customer‐facing service provision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%