Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1109/wsc.2010.5679176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to simulation input modeling

Abstract: In this tutorial we first review introductory techniques for simulation input modeling. We then identify situations in which the standard input models fail to adequately represent the available input data. In particular, we consider the cases where the input process may (i) have marginal characteristics that are not captured by standard distributions; (ii) exhibit dependence; and (iii) change over time. For case (i), we review flexible distribution systems, while we review two widely used multivariate input mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A challenge limiting the practicality of MCS is the requirement that impact parameters be input as probability distributions (Step 4). Distributions can be derived using a variety of methods depending on the types and amount of data available (Biller and Gunes 2010). As a relatively new type of construction, wind farm projects typically lack the volume of historical data required to derive probability distributions using statistical means.…”
Section: Risk Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A challenge limiting the practicality of MCS is the requirement that impact parameters be input as probability distributions (Step 4). Distributions can be derived using a variety of methods depending on the types and amount of data available (Biller and Gunes 2010). As a relatively new type of construction, wind farm projects typically lack the volume of historical data required to derive probability distributions using statistical means.…”
Section: Risk Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, triangular distributions were assumed for each of the input variables using the low, middle, and high values from Table 11. In the absence of additional data on the statistical distribution of the variables, Biller and Gunes 52 indicate that this distribution is adequate when variation ranges, such as those provided, are known. The tornado charts (Figures 16–20) show the variation intervals of TC , defined by the 5% and 95% percentiles of the TC distribution, as a function of each of each ones of the input variables, studying their effects over the TC separately.…”
Section: Competitive Analysis Of the Expanded Panama Canalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EasyFit supports all common methods for assessing the goodness of the fit including the goodness-of-fit (GOF) tests such as Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Anderson-Darling and Chi-Squared, and plots such as densityhistogram plots and probability plots. A brief discussion of these methods can be found in Biller and Gunes (2010). The lower statistic values of GOF tests suggest smaller distance between the empirical distribution and the fitted distribution, and thus a better fit.…”
Section: Overview Of Input Analysis and Distribution Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%