2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46162-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis

Abstract: of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
83
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the general outlier detection analysis, all variables were checked for possible outliers. In accordance with standard statistical practice, values outside the interval "upper/lower quartile ± triple interquartile range" were identified as outliers 38 and then thoroughly inspected and excluded if necessary.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the general outlier detection analysis, all variables were checked for possible outliers. In accordance with standard statistical practice, values outside the interval "upper/lower quartile ± triple interquartile range" were identified as outliers 38 and then thoroughly inspected and excluded if necessary.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software ( http://www.prism-software.com ) and STATA version 13 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Fisher's exact test compared proportions; the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare sample medians ( 26 ). Descriptive measures (mean, geometric means, standards deviation, frequencies, and percentages) were used to summarize data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation (Pearson product moment, see for example , Heumann, Schomaker & Shalabh [2016], chapter 11) between anxiety and mark is negative, as might be expected (students who are performing poorly feel more anxious), but the correlation is only modest, varying between −0.25 (2016) and −0.34 (2017) during the study (both significant at p < 0.05 level). We find that the correlation between marks and motivation towards their study is smaller, varying between 0.10 2017 While correlation is not causation, these modest correlations, at least for the larger cohorts in 2017 and 2018, do show that there is at least a weak to moderate relationship between marks and anxiety, but only a weak relationship between marks and motivation.…”
Section: Survey Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%