1995
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511809187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
3,488
0
115

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,938 publications
(3,628 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
25
3,488
0
115
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly u has a uniformly Hölder version on almost all local stable manifolds. By [KH,Proposition 19.1.1], this proves the result.…”
Section: Proof Let ρ Denote a Right-invariant Metric On Gsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly u has a uniformly Hölder version on almost all local stable manifolds. By [KH,Proposition 19.1.1], this proves the result.…”
Section: Proof Let ρ Denote a Right-invariant Metric On Gsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…As u(φ t x) = F t (x)u(x) a.e., u has a Hölder version along orbits. By repeated use of [KH,Proposition 19.1.1], this is sufficient to conclude that u has a Hölder version.…”
Section: Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus Θ 1 contains a dense G δ subset of the circle. 7 We now suppose that there exists some θ 0 ∈ Θ 1 such that K θ 0 is not a single point. We choose a connected component (a, b) of T 1 \ K θ 0 ; note that a = b.…”
Section: Ergodic Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7]) holds, with invariant strips playing the role of periodic orbits in the unforced case: Theorem 1.1 (Theorems 3.1 and 4.1 in [1]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First we will show that for .A-foliations there exists a global cross-section such that the corresponding return map does not admit interval exchange transformations (IET), see [21] for the definition. Next we will prove that under the restrictions, imposed on the divergence of the foliation in singular points, there exists an ergodic measure, invariant under the return map (or, what is the same, there are no 'wandering intervals').…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%