2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10701-009-9308-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intuitionistic Quantum Logic of an n-level System

Abstract: A decade ago, Isham and Butterfield proposed a topos-theoretic approach to quantum mechanics, which meanwhile has been extended by Döring and Isham so as to provide a new mathematical foundation for all of physics. Last year, three of the present authors redeveloped and refined these ideas by combining the C*-algebraic approach to quantum theory with the so-called internal language of topos theory (Heunen et al. in arXiv:0709.4364). The goal of the present paper is to illustrate our abstract setup through the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Either one uses C(A); the canonical contextual set C → C is a commutative C*-algebra, and the spectral contextual set X does not take a canonical form [72,73,21,74,126,109]. • Or one uses the opposite order; the spectral contextual set X is a locale of the canonical form C → Spec(C), and the commutative C*-algebra C(X) does not take a canonical form [40,41,39,49].…”
Section: Toposesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• Either one uses C(A); the canonical contextual set C → C is a commutative C*-algebra, and the spectral contextual set X does not take a canonical form [72,73,21,74,126,109]. • Or one uses the opposite order; the spectral contextual set X is a locale of the canonical form C → Spec(C), and the commutative C*-algebra C(X) does not take a canonical form [40,41,39,49].…”
Section: Toposesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can only touch on it briefly here, but one of the main features of building the topos of contextual sets over C(A) and distilling the configuration space Spec(A) is that they encode a contextual logic. This logic is intuitionistic, and therefore very different from traditional quantum logic [21]. The latter concerns the set Proj(A) of yes-no questions on the quantum system A; more precisely, the set of sharp observables with two outcomes.…”
Section: Toposesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the topos approach begun by Chris Isham and Jeremy Butterfield and continued with Andreas Doering and others, it was noted that there is an associated intuitionist logic that can be used that has the potential to avoid difficulties encountered in the quantum logical approach, one considering the formal language of quantum theory via the notion of Boolean contexts [36,37]. A topos is a category that can be considered a generalized universe of sets with an internal intuitionist logic offering the possibility of distributivity that promises greater structural similarity with classical theory.…”
Section: Logic and Experience In Quantum Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, the results about commutative C*-algebras may be obtained directly using Riesz spaces [14]. This is used in applications of topos theory to quantum theory [10,16,17].…”
Section: Theorem 1 [Stone-yosida] Let R Be An Archimedean Riesz Spacementioning
confidence: 99%