Consumers prefer to watch television programs without commercials. Yet, in spite of most consumers' extensive experience with watching television, we propose that commercial interruptions can actually improve the television-viewing experience. Although consumers do not foresee it, their enjoyment diminishes over time. Commercial interruptions can disrupt this adaptation process and restore the intensity of consumers' enjoyment. Six studies demonstrate that, although people preferred to avoid commercial interruptions, these interruptions actually made programs more enjoyable (study 1), regardless of the quality of the commercial (study 2), even when controlling for the mere presence of the ads (study 3), and regardless of the nature of the interruption (study 4). However, this effect was eliminated for people who are less likely to adapt (study 5) and for programs that do not lead to adaptation (study 6), confirming the disruption of adaptation account and identifying crucial boundaries of the effect.P eople like watching television, but they dislike watching television commercials. Indeed, entertainment technology is substantially guided by a nearly universal desire to remove disruptions. Consumers will pay extra to subscribe to broadcasts, invest in technological innovations, or purchase recordings in pursuit of an uninterrupted viewing experience. On the one hand, given that television viewing is one of the most popular leisure activities, consumers could be expected to have the knowledge and experience to maximize their enjoyment. This suggests that removing commercials indeed increases consumers' enjoyment of the shows they are watching-as it often probably does. On the other hand, the decision to remove commercials requires consumers to accurately forecast the hedonic consequences of that decision, and this type of forecasting falls in the domain of a particularly common human shortcoming. People tend to be poor at predicting how their enjoyment of an experience will progress over time and how changes in the