2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0303-2434(00)85006-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inventory of major landscape changes in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Slovak Republic 1970s – 1990s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This trend includes the decline of agricultural activity, increase in urban sprawl, increase in the development of roads and the pressure from leisure activities (Feranec et al 2000;Jongman 2002;Van Eetvelde, Antrop 2004). The results confirm also the trend of the increase of pastures in the Czech Republic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This trend includes the decline of agricultural activity, increase in urban sprawl, increase in the development of roads and the pressure from leisure activities (Feranec et al 2000;Jongman 2002;Van Eetvelde, Antrop 2004). The results confirm also the trend of the increase of pastures in the Czech Republic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Our regional analysis depicts a net increase of forested areas in the Czech Republic and Slovakia of 4.6% and 2%, respectively, between 1987 and 2005, while we found an overall decrease of 4.2% in forest cover for the Polish part of the study site. These results prove that there are large regional differences in forest cover changes in and between the three countries which are not depicted in national forest statistics (Feranec et al, 2000;Bielecka and Ciołkosz, 2004;FAO, 2005;Feranec et al, 2007). Moreover, statistics focusing on net forest cover neglect the spatio-temporal correspondence of forest disturbances and reforestation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Selected directions of changes have also been visualized by Pazúr and Hurbánek (2006) by means of a relevant colour area symbol. Area symbols have also been used in the visualization of landscape changes in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia with the specification of a process that took place between the 1970s and the 1990s (Feranec et al, 2000). This approach makes it possible to visualize areas that have undergone transformation in the form of intensive or extensive agriculture, urbanization, deforestation or other anthropogenic activities.…”
Section: Landscape Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%