2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse analysis of traction-separation relationship based on sequentially linear approach

Abstract: Traction-separation relationship is an important material characteristic describing the fracture behaviour of quasi-brittle solids. A new numerical scheme for identification of the traction-separation relation by inverse analysis of data obtained from various types of fracture tests is proposed. Due to employing the concept of sequentially linear analysis, the method exhibits a superior numerical stability and versatility. The applicability and effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated on examples i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, accounting for toughening mechanisms at the microscale was not undertaken in this work [ 31 , 32 ] and is left for further developments. Future work may also involve refining the TSL by either further optimizing the softening function or by using an established inverse method to fit a TSL to experimental data [ 33 ]. Our simulations also do not account for complex phenomena such as the occurrence of modes of plastic deformation, crack tip-blunting, and explicit dependencies on both crack tip position and velocity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, accounting for toughening mechanisms at the microscale was not undertaken in this work [ 31 , 32 ] and is left for further developments. Future work may also involve refining the TSL by either further optimizing the softening function or by using an established inverse method to fit a TSL to experimental data [ 33 ]. Our simulations also do not account for complex phenomena such as the occurrence of modes of plastic deformation, crack tip-blunting, and explicit dependencies on both crack tip position and velocity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, accounting for toughening mechanisms at the microscale was not undertaken in this work [31,32] and is left for further developments. Future work may also involve refining the TSL used by either further optimizing the softening function or using an established inverse method to fit a TSL to experimental data [33]. Our simulations also do not account for complex phenomena such as the occurrence of modes of plastic deformation, crack tip blunting, and explicit dependencies on crack tip position and velocity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of these models consider the contribution of fiber-reinforcement mechanisms through a cohesive traction-separation law obtained from semiempirical recommendations, or from experimental results, either directly or from inverse analysis (IA). 44 However, there is still considerable uncertainty regarding the most adequate methodology to derive the values of the model parameters for analyzing a given structure. An inadequate assessment of these values provides results without any representativeness of the real behavior of the structure.…”
Section: Numerical Approaches For Modeling the Behavior Of Frc Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%