2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.01.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse correlation between RASSF1A hypermethylation, KRAS and BRAF mutations in cervical adenocarcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
33
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
7
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Amongst these, a KRAS p.G12D mutation was identified at a high frequency (7.7%, 2/26) in cervical adenocarcinoma, but was absent in the 207 cases of squamous cell carcinoma and in the 27 of adenosquamous carcinoma. The frequency of the KRAS mutation observed in the tissue samples analyzed in the present study was similar to that identified in numerous previous studies, where the frequency of the KRAS mutation ranged from 8.0-17.5% in cervical adenocarcinoma, to absent or rare in cervical squamous cell carcinoma (11,20,21). Taken together, these results further support the hypothesis that KRAS mutations are frequent and may be a driving factor for the development of cervical adenocarcinoma (20,21), but not for squamous cell carcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Amongst these, a KRAS p.G12D mutation was identified at a high frequency (7.7%, 2/26) in cervical adenocarcinoma, but was absent in the 207 cases of squamous cell carcinoma and in the 27 of adenosquamous carcinoma. The frequency of the KRAS mutation observed in the tissue samples analyzed in the present study was similar to that identified in numerous previous studies, where the frequency of the KRAS mutation ranged from 8.0-17.5% in cervical adenocarcinoma, to absent or rare in cervical squamous cell carcinoma (11,20,21). Taken together, these results further support the hypothesis that KRAS mutations are frequent and may be a driving factor for the development of cervical adenocarcinoma (20,21), but not for squamous cell carcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, it was noted that each tissue sample analyzed in the present study contained >40% of tumor cells; this is beyond the detection sensitivity of Sanger sequencing, which has a detection threshold of 6.6-20% of the mutated allele in a background of the wild-type allele (15)(16)(17)(18)(19). Furthermore, a high frequency of KRAS mutations were detected in the cervical adenocarcinoma tissues using Sanger sequencing, which is comparable to that observed by numerous previous studies wherein the analyzed patient tissue samples contained high proportions of cancerous cells (≥40% malignant cells), comparable to the proportion of malignant cells in the present study (11,20,21). Therefore, a possible explanation for the discrepancy in mutation frequencies is the difference in ethnic background, as the prior study (11) focused on European females whilst the current sample cohort was Chinese in origin, suggesting that the ERK2 mutations may be specific to certain populations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Further, CIMP-high was associated with HPV positivity and methylation frequencies of most of the genes/loci were higher in HPV associated cases except RASSF1. This inverse association of HPV and RASSF1 corroborates previous findings that HPV infection inversely correlates with RASSF1A methylation in human cervical squamous cell carcinomas [45]. The role of HPV in promoting aberrant host DNA methylation is evident in both clinical as well as cell culture studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The prevalence of RASSF1A promoter methylation in cervical adenocarcinoma is around 20%, and there is an inverse correlation between RASSF1A inactivation and the presence of HPV-transforming gene products (65,66). It may suggest that RASSF1A promoter methylation plays an important role in the development of cervical adenocarcinoma, independently of HPV infection status.…”
Section: Intracellular Signaling Kinasesmentioning
confidence: 99%