2003
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-03-03355-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse functions of polynomials and orthogonal polynomials as operator monotone functions

Abstract: Abstract. We study the operator monotonicity of the inverse of every polynomial with a positive leading coefficient. Let {pn} ∞ n=0 be a sequence of orthonormal polynomials and p n+ the restriction of pn to [an, ∞), where an is the maximum zero of pn. Then p

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Q is a positive semi definite matrix, A i are arbitrary square matrices, f i are Löwner-Heinz monotone operators and g is an Uchiyama operator [16][17][18]. Our results improve, extend and generalize some existing ones in the literature [11,15,19,20].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where Q is a positive semi definite matrix, A i are arbitrary square matrices, f i are Löwner-Heinz monotone operators and g is an Uchiyama operator [16][17][18]. Our results improve, extend and generalize some existing ones in the literature [11,15,19,20].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In this section, we show at first that some existing monotone operators in the literature are already strictly super-homogeneous and surjective. Next, we derive a corollary from a previous result and solve nonlinear equations involving Uchiyama's operator functions [16,17]. We construct two algorithms for monotone and antitone operators, and we apply them to solve several nonlinear matrix equations.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That p À1 is semi-operator monotone on ½0; 1Þ, i.e. pð ffiffi t p Þ 2 2 P À1 þ ½0; 1Þ, has been shown in Theorem 4.1 of [10]. However we now give a simple and direct proof of it by making use of Product Theorem.…”
Section: These Imply ðHmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In Theorem 3.5 we will generalize it. To do so, we need the following lemma, whose first assertion was stated in Remark 1 of [9] and the second one was essentially proved in the proof of Theorem 3.2 of [10]. But for the sake of completeness we give a proof.…”
Section: These Imply ðHmentioning
confidence: 99%