2016 IEEE/OES China Ocean Acoustics (COA) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/coa.2016.7535631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse proportional surface fitting-based image registration method for interferometric synthetic aperture sonar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of mean filter with 5×5 window size, Lee filter, regularized P‐M filter and the proposed method are shown in Figure 2c–f respectively. In order to compare the results quantitatively, residue number [18], edge preserve index (EPI) [17], and time cost are selected, which are shown in Table 1. From Table 1, it can be seen that the residue number of the proposed method is the least in the four methods.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of mean filter with 5×5 window size, Lee filter, regularized P‐M filter and the proposed method are shown in Figure 2c–f respectively. In order to compare the results quantitatively, residue number [18], edge preserve index (EPI) [17], and time cost are selected, which are shown in Table 1. From Table 1, it can be seen that the residue number of the proposed method is the least in the four methods.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method uses the atmospheric compensation factors retrieved from the statistics of the image scene and is suitable for regions where solar illumination intensity is unknown (Agrawal et al 2011). The Hyperion image were geometrically co-registered to OLI image using well-distributed 57 control points based on the popular polynomial transformation method (Huang et al 2016;Phetcharat et al 2014;Song et al 2017;Tanács et al 2015). The accuracy was controlled by calculating the RMS error (RMSE = 0.39).…”
Section: Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The InSAS workflow primarily consists of synthetic aperture imaging, 2429 complex image registration, 30,31 interferometric map generation, unflattening, phase filtering, phase unwrapping, 32,33 and digital elevation model reconstruction. The interferometric phase map obtained after complex image registration and conjugate multiplication is generally not used directly for phase unwrapping because the interferogram SNR is low at this time, there is a lot of noise in the image, and the phase in the interferogram cannot reflect the real topography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 Its primary military applications include detection of mines and unexploded ordnance and reconnaissance of important sea areas, while its main civil applications include salvaging wrecks and sunken objects, 22 mapping underwater topographies, surveying submarine deposits, and finding submarine fiber optic cables. 23 The InSAS workflow primarily consists of synthetic aperture imaging, [24][25][26][27][28][29] complex image registration, 30,31 interferometric map generation, unflattening, phase filtering, phase unwrapping, 32,33 and digital elevation model reconstruction. The interferometric phase map obtained after complex image registration and conjugate multiplication is generally not used directly for phase unwrapping because the interferogram SNR is low at this time, there is a lot of noise in the image, and the phase in the interferogram cannot reflect the real topography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%