2012
DOI: 10.4236/am.2012.35072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse Shadowing and Weak Inverse Shadowing Property

Abstract: In this paper we show that an -stable diffeomorphism has the weak inverse shadowing property with respect to classes of continuous method and and some of the -stable diffeomorphisms have weak inverse shadowing property with respect to classes . In addition we study relation between minimality and weak inverse shadowing property with respect to class and relation between expansivity and inverse shadowing property with respect to class

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile in [21], Kloeden and Ombach prove that a structurally stable homeomorphism on a compact space has inverse shadowing with respect to the class of methods induced by homeomorphism. Further results in this direction can be found in [8,19,22]. We remark that inverse shadowing, particularly with regard to the class of methods induced by homeomorphism, is closely related to Lewowicz's notion of persistency [24] (see also [35]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Meanwhile in [21], Kloeden and Ombach prove that a structurally stable homeomorphism on a compact space has inverse shadowing with respect to the class of methods induced by homeomorphism. Further results in this direction can be found in [8,19,22]. We remark that inverse shadowing, particularly with regard to the class of methods induced by homeomorphism, is closely related to Lewowicz's notion of persistency [24] (see also [35]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…(NB. In the statement of [19,Theorem 3] the authors assume the phase space is compact, this assumption does not appear necessary for their proof nor ours.) Recall first that a system (X, f ) is said to be minimal if, for A ⊆ X closed, f (A) = A implies that A = X or A = ∅.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations