2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.12.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inversion and accumulation layers at InN surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The band bending V bb has been calculated from the relative surface and bulk Fermi level positions. The electron sheet density (electron accumulation) has been determined by space charge calculations using Poisson's equation [15] within the modified Thomas-Fermi approximation (MTFA) [16][17][18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The band bending V bb has been calculated from the relative surface and bulk Fermi level positions. The electron sheet density (electron accumulation) has been determined by space charge calculations using Poisson's equation [15] within the modified Thomas-Fermi approximation (MTFA) [16][17][18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was argued that the n-type inversion layer at the surface completely prevents direct electrical contact to the bulk interior because it is isolated from the p-type bulk material by a depletion region originating from the strong band bending. 3,4 Hence it makes impossible to see the contribution of free holes in the bulk to the transport properties of the sample and Hall measurements should give information about electron concentration and mobility in the n-type inversion layer only. 3,4 Such conclusion was also supported by very low electron mobilities found in Mg-doped samples in Hall measurements, as expected for surface inversion layer.…”
Section: Search For Free Holes In Inn:mg-interplay Between Surface Lamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Hence it makes impossible to see the contribution of free holes in the bulk to the transport properties of the sample and Hall measurements should give information about electron concentration and mobility in the n-type inversion layer only. 3,4 Such conclusion was also supported by very low electron mobilities found in Mg-doped samples in Hall measurements, as expected for surface inversion layer. 3 Recently several groups reported the possibility of successful p-type doping of the bulk InN under n-type surface layer.…”
Section: Search For Free Holes In Inn:mg-interplay Between Surface Lamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, thermopower increases with effective mass because increasing the mass increases the density of states, again increasing the Fermi-level/band-edge separation for a given carrier concentration. Both of these aspects favor detection of holes in the bulk rather than electrons at the surface of p-type InN since the electron concentration in the inversion layer is expected to be significantly larger than the bulk hole concentration and the hole effective mass in InN is predicted to be about 10 times larger than the electron effective mass [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%