Invertebrate Learning 1973
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-3006-6_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invertebrate Learning and Behavior Taxonomies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 173 publications
(142 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nous pensons que cette procédure (lot 2) se rapprocherait plutôt du «Paradigme de punition» évoqué par Dyal et Corning (1973) puisque les deux procédures se calquent parfaitement l’une sur l’autre (Fig. 2): dans le paradigme de Dyal et Corning, le premier stimulus S1 induit une réponse R1, est suivie immédiatement par un stimulus S2 nocif et aversif qui induit à son tour une réponse R2 interne et manifeste.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nous pensons que cette procédure (lot 2) se rapprocherait plutôt du «Paradigme de punition» évoqué par Dyal et Corning (1973) puisque les deux procédures se calquent parfaitement l’une sur l’autre (Fig. 2): dans le paradigme de Dyal et Corning, le premier stimulus S1 induit une réponse R1, est suivie immédiatement par un stimulus S2 nocif et aversif qui induit à son tour une réponse R2 interne et manifeste.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…This experiment provides evidence for an interpretation in terms of cognitive association. The model of learning is not a Pavlovian conditioning as advanced by Medioni and Vaysse (1975), but corresponds to the punishment paradigm of Dyal and Corning (1973).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before any change in the behavior of an organism can be attributed to learning, alternative interpretations of the data must be ruled out. Several such alternatives that have been described are pseudoconditioning (Dyal & Corning, 1973), sensitization (Razran, 1971), and a central excitatory state (Dethier, Solomon, & Turner, 1965). In general, these "artifacts" are attributed to an increase in the subjects' level of responsiveness, which is not dependent upon specific response-reinforcer contingencies (in the case of instrumental learning).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years several taxonomies have been proposed but none adapted. These include Bitterman (1962) for both classical and operant conditioning, Dyal and Corning (1973) and Gormezano and Kehoe (1975) for classical conditioning and Woods (1974) for instrumental and operant conditioning. In Woods (1974) classification he identifies 16 categories of conditioning based on the presence or absence of a discriminative stimulus and the desirability of the reward.…”
Section: Taxonomies Of Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%