2016
DOI: 10.1504/jdr.2016.079736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating a design validation process: how jurors handle criteria in a design competition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, discussion of how to cultivate design students to have the know-how and techniques to use their imagination systematically has become an important issue in the design industry and design education. Taiwanese design students have won many awards in international design competitions, but close examination of their design concepts shows there is still plenty of room for improvement in the user experience and originality of the products (Techbang, 2013) and whether a contestant can win an award has something to do with the viewpoints of the judges and angles of inspection (Meyer, 2016). Overemphasis on design competitions can reduce students' learning opportunities (Walden, Foor, Pan, Shehab, & Trytten, 2015).…”
Section: / 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, discussion of how to cultivate design students to have the know-how and techniques to use their imagination systematically has become an important issue in the design industry and design education. Taiwanese design students have won many awards in international design competitions, but close examination of their design concepts shows there is still plenty of room for improvement in the user experience and originality of the products (Techbang, 2013) and whether a contestant can win an award has something to do with the viewpoints of the judges and angles of inspection (Meyer, 2016). Overemphasis on design competitions can reduce students' learning opportunities (Walden, Foor, Pan, Shehab, & Trytten, 2015).…”
Section: / 12mentioning
confidence: 99%