2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating a novel fMRI cannabis cue reactivity task in youth

Abstract: Cannabis-using youth show more activation to cannabis cues than non-cannabis cues in brain regions underlying incentive salience, reward, and visual attention. This task could be useful for future studies examining neural underpinnings of reward processes in adolescent cannabis users.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
38
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This would suggest that altered reward responsivity is not a predisposition among CAN+ALC-SUD but rather a consequence of use. However, an exaggerated neural response to alcohol and cannabis images in limbic regions has been observed among alcohol-using adolescents and young adults [36,37,53]. A possible reason for our discrepant finding could be differences in characteristics defining each sample.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This would suggest that altered reward responsivity is not a predisposition among CAN+ALC-SUD but rather a consequence of use. However, an exaggerated neural response to alcohol and cannabis images in limbic regions has been observed among alcohol-using adolescents and young adults [36,37,53]. A possible reason for our discrepant finding could be differences in characteristics defining each sample.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…For example, participants in the present study used both alcohol and cannabis. Reward circuitry among alcohol and cannabis users may differ from individuals who only consume alcohol and/or cannabis like those in the previously mentioned investigation [36,37]. Future examination of reward circuitry in single-and multi-substance users with a larger sample could help to elucidate this question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 21-item version of the DASS was administered to assess depression, anxiety, and stress symptomology (Lovibond and Lovibond 1995). The Customary Drinking and Drug Use Record structured interview (Brown et al 1998), modified to include additional cannabis and nicotine questions (Jacobus et al 2018;Karoly et al 2019a;Karoly et al 2019b), was used to assess history of substance use and substance-related problems. For the purposes of this study, current nicotine use was defined as the use of an NTP more than once per month during the previous year.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, dysfunctional interoceptive processing may result in substance users seeking out and consuming drugs in order to reduce uncomfortable interoceptive states. Neuroimaging research suggests that drug cues activate brain regions similar to those activated by aversive interoceptive stimuli; cannabis cues elicit activation in parahippocampal gyri and various frontal regions among non-treatment-seeking cannabis-using adolescents [36]. Adolescents who primarily use alcohol also demonstrate an exaggerated neural response within frontal regions including IFG, parahippocampus, amygdala, and posterior cingulate in response to cue images [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%