2020
DOI: 10.1108/qmr-07-2018-0077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating consumer experience in hybrid museums: a netnographic study

Abstract: Purpose Hybrid structures are emerging in the leisure sector that are neither museums nor amusement parks, but which borrow elements from both. Dedicated to the exploration of a cultural theme (cultural heritage, ecosystems and historic events), they use experiential marketing levers to entertain large publics while at the same time pursuing the cultural integrity of heritage. This study aims to examine how visitors perceive and experience the offer proposed by these hybrid museums and how they manage the dual… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This entails a greater ability of cultural institutions to engage physical visitors, involving them in a durable co‐creating relationship (Elgammal et al, 2020). Digitalization empowers people and make them active co‐producers of the visiting experience (Romanelli, 2018), propelling their satisfaction with the cultural service offering and soliciting their willingness to enter in contact with the cultural institution (Passebois Ducros & Euzéby, 2021). In turn, this fosters the OA towards current and prospective visitors (Manna & Palumbo, 2018).…”
Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This entails a greater ability of cultural institutions to engage physical visitors, involving them in a durable co‐creating relationship (Elgammal et al, 2020). Digitalization empowers people and make them active co‐producers of the visiting experience (Romanelli, 2018), propelling their satisfaction with the cultural service offering and soliciting their willingness to enter in contact with the cultural institution (Passebois Ducros & Euzéby, 2021). In turn, this fosters the OA towards current and prospective visitors (Manna & Palumbo, 2018).…”
Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings also challenge assumptions that the co-creation of meaning is a subjective and personalized process dependent on the individual’s cultural capital (Plakoyiannaki et al , 2022), dividing a priori art experiences into emotional and cognitive (Pelowski et al , 2018), studying personal sense-making activities in co-creating personally meaningful experiences (e.g. Ducros and Euzéby, 2020; Plakoyiannaki et al , 2022) and using enjoyment or satisfaction as measures of art values (Antón et al , 2018a, 2018b). Our findings (Figure 2) interpret particular encounters of viewers with artefacts as moments of transformable practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…In February 2018, we started a formal data collection process by closely following Kozinets’ (2020, p. 192) guidelines to conduct netnographic work. As discussed in prior research (Kozinets et al , 2021; Passebois Ducros and Euzéby, 2020), netnography is a naturalistic method that approaches cultural phenomena in their contexts, providing access to naturally occurring social behaviors. Moreover, netnography is “based primarily on the observation of textual discourse” (Kozinets, 2002, p. 64), which makes it an appropriate method for this study.…”
Section: Context and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%