Investigating interdependencies of sustainable supplier selection criteria: an appraisal using ISM

Abstract

Purpose Because of the increased global competition and the need for environment consciousness, organisations have started focusing on incorporating sustainability dimensions into suppler selection criteria. In the past decade, sustainable supplier selection has received much attention from researchers as well as industry practitioners. The purpose of this paper is to identify various sustainable supplier selection criteria (SSSC) and underlying interdependencies among prominent selection criteria to develop a framework for sustainability dimensions. Design/methodology/approach The sustainable criteria for supplier selection were established through comprehensive literature review. An interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach is used to investigate the interrelationships among these criteria. Findings A total of 21 SSSC under 3 dimensions (social, environmental and economic) are established. Ten criteria related to quality, capability, flexibility, waste management, pollution prevention, local community, employment practice, labour, etc. are exhibiting strong driving as well as dependence power, as demonstrated through ISM and matriced’ impacts croises-multiplication applique’ and classement (MICMAC) analysis. The findings show that delivery/service, eco design and rights of stakeholders are the “key” criteria having a high-driving and low-dependence power. These criteria require high attention from managers, while other criteria having low-driving and high-dependence power require secondary actions. Research limitations/implications The inter-relations for the development of ISM model and MICMAC analysis were obtained through the opinion of industry experts and academicians, which may tend to be subjectively biased. Further exploration is proposed to statistically validate the developed interdependency model. Practical implications This paper might act as a reference for the supplier development managers of organisations by providing an appraisal of various SSSC based on their interdependencies. Originality/value This study contributes to the knowledge base by proposing a framework of the interrelationships of the SSSC and also provides an additional perspective for managing these criteria based on ISM.

Assessing supply chain resilience to the outbreak of COVID-19 in Indian manufacturing firms

“…The interdependency among the indicators is analysed by Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) methodology. There exists many methods that are used for prioritization and ranking of factors, but ISM is a widely used method for providing hierarchal structure (Yadav and Desai 2017 ; Chauhan et al 2020 ; Liu et al 2021 ). To model dependency in this complex network, in the next phase, Bayesian Network (BN) is implemented which uses probabilities to evaluate the critical indicators in the supply chain.…”

Study of ethical issues of green procurement in Indian automobile industry using integrated ISM-fuzzy MICMAC – AHP –VIKOR

“…4.1 Application of interpretive structural modelling-fuzzy Matrice d'Impacts Croisés-Multiplication Appliquée a un Classement approach ISM was designed by Warfield (1974) to develop the hierarchy and to realize the direct and indirect relationships among the variables (Chauhan et al, 2020). The steps for ISM methodology are presented in the following subsections.…”

“…Green supply chain management has received considerable attention recently (Sarkis, 1999;Mukherjee and Mondal, 2009;Chauhan et al, 2020) resulting in improvement in competitive advantage (Bouzon et al, 2016). GSCM practice in the Indian automobile sector is at the nascent stage (Kumar and Subrahmanya, 2010;Balakrishnan and Suresh, 2019).…”

Disruptions in sourcing and distribution practices of supply chains due to COVID-19 pandemic: a sustainability paradigm

“…Distribution logistics is the thrust area to understand the impact of environmental and social activities of the firm with respect to sustainability (Chauhan et al , 2020); as distribution cause usage of vehicles that causes the emission of CO 2 , which is the main reason behind the global warming (Akyelken, 2011). Approximately 33% of CO 2 emissions are caused by the distribution and transport sector (EPA, 2012).…”