2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating Number Sense Among Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
39
0
24

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
7
39
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, students who exhibit good results with strict calculations do not obtain the same results in those tasks where they need to make use of number sense. Findings from these studies confirm the idea that strict calculation skills without understanding are of little use in contexts that require more than just algorithms (NCTM, 2000;Veloo, 2010;Mohamed & Johnny, 2010). In contrast to the foregoing, a significant correlation has been observed between high academic grades in mathematics and a good level of number sense in students (Yang et al, 2008).…”
Section: Components Of Number Sensesupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, students who exhibit good results with strict calculations do not obtain the same results in those tasks where they need to make use of number sense. Findings from these studies confirm the idea that strict calculation skills without understanding are of little use in contexts that require more than just algorithms (NCTM, 2000;Veloo, 2010;Mohamed & Johnny, 2010). In contrast to the foregoing, a significant correlation has been observed between high academic grades in mathematics and a good level of number sense in students (Yang et al, 2008).…”
Section: Components Of Number Sensesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Among the research that analyzed the most complex components for students, Yang, et al (2008) and Mohamed and Johnny (2010) found that understanding the relative effect of operations (Component 5, Table 1) and checking the data and recognizing when a result is reasonable (Component 8, Table 1) are the components that present the most difficulties. Helping students develop number sense is an important objective of mathematical instruction (Anghileri, 2006;Reys et al, 1999).…”
Section: Components Of Number Sensementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, students who exhibit good results with strict calculations do not obtain the same results in those tasks where they need to make use of number sense. Findings from these studies confirm the idea that strict calculation skills without understanding are of little use in contexts that require more than just algorithms (NCTM, 2000;Veloo, 2010;Mohamed & Johnny, 2010). In contrast to the foregoing, a significant correlation has been observed between high academic grades in mathematics and a good level of number sense in students (Yang et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Among the research that analyzed the most complex components for students, Yang, et al (2008) and Mohamed and Johnny (2010) found that understanding the relative effect of operations (Component 5, Table 1) and checking the data and recognizing when a result is reasonable (Component 8, Table 1) are the components that present the most difficulties. Helping students develop number sense is an important objective of mathematical instruction (Anghileri, 2006;Reys et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu çeşitlilik ve sıklıkta kullanılan tahmin becerisi, matematik dersi içerisinde önemli bir yere sahip olup; Türkiye, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, Malezya, Japonya, Çin gibi bazı ülkelerin matematik dersi öğretim programlarında kazandırılması hedeflenen beceriler arasında sayılmaktadır (Alajmi, 2009;Liu, 2009;MEB, 2009aMEB, , 2009bMEB, , 2013Mohamed & Johnny, 2010;NCTM, 2000;Reys, Reys, Nohda, Ishida, Yoshikawa, & Shimizu, 1991). Ülkemizde 1948 yılından bu yana incelenen ilköğretim ile ilgili matematik dersi öğretimi programlarında bu beceriye önem verildiği görülmektedir (MEB, 1948(MEB, , 1968(MEB, , 1998(MEB, , 2009a(MEB, , 2009b(MEB, , 2013(MEB, , 2015MEGSB, 1983 (Fang, 1996;Ford 1994;Kagan, 1992;Raymond, 1997;Thompson, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified