2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating river health and potential risks using a novel hybrid decision-making framework with multi-source data fusion in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main subjective weighting methods are the Delphi method and the analytic hierarchy process (Zhang et al 2022a). The former requires multiple experts and is difficult to implement.…”
Section: Subjective Weight-analytic Hierarchy Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main subjective weighting methods are the Delphi method and the analytic hierarchy process (Zhang et al 2022a). The former requires multiple experts and is difficult to implement.…”
Section: Subjective Weight-analytic Hierarchy Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, when determining the location of a given barrage, multi-faceted analysis plays an important role, where the technical, environmental, transport, economic, social, and functional criteria are taken into account [4]. It is worth adding that when studying ecological factors, it is necessary to consider the impact of navigation on the river ecosystems, determining the spatial distribution, potential risks and drivers of river health, but also to present the programs for ecological conservation and sustainable river management based on detailed studies [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%