2007
DOI: 10.1021/jp0674322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the Chemical Dynamics of the Reaction of Ground-State Carbon Atoms with Acetylene and Its Isotopomers

Abstract: We investigated the multichannel reaction of ground-state carbon atoms with acetylene, C2H2 (X1Sigmag+), to form the linear and cyclic C3H isomers (atomic hydrogen elimination pathway) as well as tricarbon plus molecular hydrogen. The experiments were conducted under single-collision conditions at three different collision energies between 8.0 kJ mol-1 and 31.0 kJ mol-1. Our studies were complemented by crossed molecular beam experiments of carbon with three isotopomers C2D2(X1Sigmag+), C2HD (X1Sigma+), and 13… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
71
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
14
71
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The branching ratio R2 = σ (1c)/σ (1) takes values 0.82 and 0.87 at E T = 0.8 and 4.8 kJ mol −1 , respectively, which are higher than those given in the crossed-beam experiments of Leonori et al (2008) at E T 3.5 kJ mol −1 , the bulk study at 300 K of Bergeat & Loison (2001) and the calculations of Mebel et al (2007), and Park et al (2006). It is in line with the crossed-beam study of Gu et al (2007) since extrapolation of their curve based on data at E T 8.8 kJ mol −1 would result in R2 around 0.9 at low E T . Clearly, the title reaction is governed by indirect dynamics below E T 4.8 kJ mol −1 and the collision complex finds ample time to sample the whole phase space before dissociating into products.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The branching ratio R2 = σ (1c)/σ (1) takes values 0.82 and 0.87 at E T = 0.8 and 4.8 kJ mol −1 , respectively, which are higher than those given in the crossed-beam experiments of Leonori et al (2008) at E T 3.5 kJ mol −1 , the bulk study at 300 K of Bergeat & Loison (2001) and the calculations of Mebel et al (2007), and Park et al (2006). It is in line with the crossed-beam study of Gu et al (2007) since extrapolation of their curve based on data at E T 8.8 kJ mol −1 would result in R2 around 0.9 at low E T . Clearly, the title reaction is governed by indirect dynamics below E T 4.8 kJ mol −1 and the collision complex finds ample time to sample the whole phase space before dissociating into products.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Numerous theoretical and experimental studies have aimed at elucidating the dynamics of the C + C 2 H 2 reaction: determinations of the potential energy surfaces (Takahashi & Yamashita 1996;Ochsenfeld et al 1997;Guadagnini et al 1998;Buonomo & Clary 2001;Clary et al 2002;Takayanagi 2005;Mebel et al 2007) including calculations in the full nine dimensions (Park et al 2006), quantum (Buonomo & Clary 2001;Clary et al 2002;Takayanagi 2006), quasi-classical trajectory (Park et al 2006), and statistical calculations (Mebel et al 2007); measurements of differential cross sections and integral cross sections in crossed molecular beam experiments employing electron-impact ionization mass spectrometric time-of-flight analysis for C 3 H and C 3 detection with pulsed Gu et al 2007) or continuous beams (Clary et al 2002;Cartechini et al 2002;Costes et al 2006;Leonori et al 2008) and spectroscopic probing of the H-atom product (Clary et al 2002;Cartechini et al 2002;Costes et al 2006). Three channels have been identified: two H-elimination channels leading to cyclic and linear forms of the C 3 H radical, the former being slightly exoergic and the latter being almost thermoneutral Mebel et al 2007), and one strongly exoergic H 2 -elimination channel which is forbidden in the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, since it requires a nonadiabatic transition from the ground-state triplet potential energy surface to a singlet one: …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the translational energies of C 2 H 2 and C 2 H 4 were essentially the same (similar reduced masses and identical relative velocities) giving rise to the same collision energy, they were able to deconvolute the respective H-atom signals in the resulting Doppler-Fizeau spectra (see Figure 7 of Costes et al [7]) given the much lower exoergicity for H-atoms produced by the C + C 2 H 2 reaction. They derived values of 0.82 and 0.87 for the ratio (1c)/(1) at 0.8 and 4.8 kJ mol -1 , considerably larger than the ones obtained by previous work in the same energy range [6,8], or at equivalent temperatures [15]. Moreover, the ratio (1c)/(1) was seen to increase with increasing collision energy; an observation which is seemingly at odds with theoretical considerations based on the argument that intersystem crossing is promoted by an increased lifetime of the C 3 H 2 intermediate.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…The H-atom yields listed in Table 2 Costes et al [7] seems to be erroneous, the energy (temperature) dependence of these results is nonetheless similar to the one determined in this work, indicating that the C 3 + H 2 product channel becomes less favourable as the temperature falls over the 300 -50 K range. In contrast, the earlier studies of Leonori et al [6] and Gu et al [8] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation