Investigating the effect of bicarbonate ion on the structure and strength of calcium silicate-based dental restorative material—Biodentine

Atmeh, Amre R.

doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03328-y

Cited by 11 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is partly due to the biocompatible and bioactive properties of this family of materials that allow them to exchange ions and interact with the surrounding environment including dentin [ 9 ]. For an endodontic sealer, this could be beneficial as the deposited minerals due to ionic exchange can occupy more space to compensate for the voids created during the process [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. Hence, some studies used physiological fluids for aging CSBSs to simulate the ion exchange and potential mineral deposition that may take place in situ [ 14 , 15 , 16 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Sealer Application Methods on Voids Volume after Aging of Three Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During obturation, air voids are undesirable as they may provide shelter for microorganisms or passage for fluids. This study aimed to compare the occurrence of voids between three calcium silicate-based sealers (CSBSs) (MTA-Fillapex, BioRoot-RCS, Bio-C) and the change in their volume after aging. In addition, we aimed to compare voids when using two sealer application methods: lentulo-spiral (LS) and gutta-percha (GP) cone. Thirty extracted mandibular premolars (n = 30) were endodontically prepared and obturated using single GP cone (SGPC) technique. Each sealer was applied to 10 teeth (n = 10) using LS or GP. Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) was used to quantify the volume of root filling and voids before and after 8-week storage in a phosphate-rich medium. The percentage of root filling and voids were compared between the groups using a Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal–Wallis test with a Bonferroni correction. Before aging, the percentages of root filling volume after obturation were comparable with no significant differences between sealers (p = 0.325) or application methods (p = 0.950). After aging, the voids’ volume increased significantly in all sealers (p ≤ 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between sealers (p = 0.302). In conclusion, voids in CSBSs may not reduce in size with aging; hence, SGPC should be carefully selected for suitable cases.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Sealer Application Methods on Voids Volume after Aging of Three Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The pH of the soaking solution ranges from 7.1 to 8.2, 8.0–9.13 and 9.3–10.7 for the hydraulic cements ProRoot MTA, MTA Angelus and Biodentine respectively (Al‐Sherbiny et al, 2021; Atmeh, 2020; Gandolfi et al, 2015a, 2015b; Guimarães et al, 2018; Pelepenko et al, 2021). Calcium ion release was reported to reduce with time (Acris De Carvalho et al, 2021; Al‐Sherbiny et al, 2021; Atmeh, 2020; Dawood et al, 2015; De Souza et al, 2018; Gandolfi et al, 2013a, 2015a, 2015b; Guimarães et al, 2018; Han et al, 2015; Kang et al, 2021; Koutroulis et al, 2019a; Mahmood Talabani et al, 2020; Natale et al, 2015; Vivan et al, 2010). Despite the variations in the methodologies and designs used to quantify calcium, which makes comparisons difficult, studies reported a 50%–70% drop in calcium release over 4 weeks following cement hydration (Al‐Sherbiny et al, 2021; Atmeh, 2020; Gandolfi et al, 2013, 2015a, 2015b; Guimarães et al, 2018; Koutroulis et al, 2019a; Mahmood Talabani et al, 2020).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The pH of the soaking solution ranges from 7.1 to 8.2, 8.0-9.13 and 9.3-10.7 for the hydraulic cements ProRoot MTA, MTA Angelus and Biodentine respectively (Al-Sherbiny et al, 2021;Atmeh, 2020;Gandolfi et al, 2015aGandolfi et al, , 2015bGuimarães et al, 2018;Pelepenko et al, 2021). Calcium ion release was reported to reduce with time (Acris De Carvalho et al, 2021;Al-Sherbiny et al, 2021;Atmeh, 2020;Dawood et al, 2015;De Souza et al, 2018;Gandolfi et al, 2013aGandolfi et al, , 2015aGandolfi et al, , 2015bGuimarães et al, 2018;Han et al, 2015;Kang et al, 2021;Koutroulis et al, 2019a;Mahmood Talabani et al, 2020;Natale et al, 2015;Vivan et al, 2010). Despite the variations in the methodologies and designs used to quantify calcium, which makes comparisons difficult, studies reported a 50%-70% drop in calcium release over 4 weeks following cement hydration (Al-Sherbiny et al, 2021;Atmeh, 2020;Gandolfi et al, 2013Gandolfi et al, , 2015aGandolfi et al, , 2015bGuimarães et al, 2018;Koutroulis et al, 2019a;Mahmood Talabani et al, 2020).…”

Section: Ion Releasementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Present status and future directions: Hydraulic materials for endodontic use

Camilleri

Atmeh

et al. 2022

Int Endodontic J

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Hydraulic materials are used in Endodontics due to their hydration characteristics namely the formation of calcium hydroxide when mixing with water and also because of their hydraulic properties. These materials are presented in various consistencies and delivery methods. They are composed primarily of tricalcium and dicalcium silicate, and also include a radiopacifier, additives and an aqueous or a non‐aqueous vehicle. Only materials whose primary reaction is with water can be classified as hydraulic. Objectives Review of the classification of hydraulic materials by Camilleri and the literature pertaining to specific uses of hydraulic cements in endodontics namely intra‐coronal, intra‐radicular and extra‐radicular. Review of the literature on the material properties linked to specific uses providing the current status of these materials after which future trends and gaps in knowledge could be identified. Methods The literature was reviewed using PUBMED, and for each clinical use, the in vitro properties such as physical, chemical, biological and antimicrobial characteristics and clinical data were extracted and evaluated. Results A large number of publications were retrieved for each clinical use and these were grouped depending on the property type being investigated. Conclusions The hydraulic cements have made a difference in clinical outcomes. The main shortcoming is the poor testing methodologies employed which provide very limited information and also inhibits adequate clinical translation. Furthermore, the clinical protocols need to be updated to enable the materials to be employed effectively.

show abstract

“…The research undertaken indicates that the use of fast setting hydraulic calcium silicate cement which is bismuth oxide free such as Biodentine is the best treatment strategy. The research investigating the use of Biodentine as a pulp preservation material (93) indicates that Biodentine has a clinically acceptable setting time which is shorter than other hydraulic calcium silicate cements (122)(123)(124), high pH and calcium ion release which is initially high but drops over time (122,123,125,126). Tooth discolouration has never been implicated with the use of Biodentine (127)(128)(129)(130)(131)despite what is stated in the British Endodontic Society Guide (114).…”

Section: Dressing the Dentinementioning

confidence: 99%

The scientific management of deep carious lesions in vital teeth using contemporary materials—a narrative review

Al-Ali

Camilleri

2022

Front. Dent. Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimThe aim of this article is to review the scientific evidence for deep caries removal in permanent vital teeth and the choice of dentine replacement material and restoration of the teeth to maintain long term tooth vitality and function.MethodThe two position statements namely the European Society of Endodontology and the American Association of Endodontists position statements on vital pulp therapy will be scrutinized and compared with regards to the deep caries removal strategy and assessed for evidence of best practice. The properties of materials used to manage vital pulps and the best way to restore the teeth will be reviewed and guidance on the full management of vital teeth will be suggested.ConclusionsPromoting new treatment modalities for reversible and irreversible pulpitis allowing for pulp preservation should be considered. Although debatable, cases with deep caries should be managed by complete non-selective caries removal which will allow for pulpal management if needed and a more predictable outcome can be expected when using the new materials and treatment modalities of vital pulp therapy.

show abstract

Investigating the effect of bicarbonate ion on the structure and strength of calcium silicate-based dental restorative material—Biodentine

Cited by 11 publications

References 47 publications

The Effect of Sealer Application Methods on Voids Volume after Aging of Three Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study

The Effect of Sealer Application Methods on Voids Volume after Aging of Three Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study

Present status and future directions: Hydraulic materials for endodontic use

The scientific management of deep carious lesions in vital teeth using contemporary materials—a narrative review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About