2020
DOI: 10.3390/molecules25061475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the Fluid–Solid Interaction of Acid Nonionic Nanoemulsion with Carbonate Porous Media

Abstract: The subject of rock–fluid interaction is important in cases where flow through porous media is occurring. One special case is when the fluid reacts with the porous matrix. In this case, the mass transfer and reaction rate control the dissolution pattern. This article aimed to study the interaction between an acid nanoemulsion system and a carbonate porous media. Nanoemulsions were developed to retard the rock’s dissolution and to promote the formation of conductivity channels. Nanoemulsions were prepared using… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies corroborate the se tivity of rock surface wettability to environmental conditions and fluid composition. F Similarly, Indiana limestone CA ranged from 77.6 to 87.9 • with an average of 83.6 • with a narrow variability, as indicated by a standard deviation of 2.80 • , which is slightly higher than the Berea sandstone, but still indicates a water-wet to intermediate-wet system, as shown in Table 2 2021) measured original and varying CAs in Indiana limestone using distilled and various saline waters, respectively [73,74], highlighting substantial variations dependent on the fluid medium. These studies corroborate the sensitivity of rock surface wettability to environmental conditions and fluid composition.…”
Section: Limestonementioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies corroborate the se tivity of rock surface wettability to environmental conditions and fluid composition. F Similarly, Indiana limestone CA ranged from 77.6 to 87.9 • with an average of 83.6 • with a narrow variability, as indicated by a standard deviation of 2.80 • , which is slightly higher than the Berea sandstone, but still indicates a water-wet to intermediate-wet system, as shown in Table 2 2021) measured original and varying CAs in Indiana limestone using distilled and various saline waters, respectively [73,74], highlighting substantial variations dependent on the fluid medium. These studies corroborate the sensitivity of rock surface wettability to environmental conditions and fluid composition.…”
Section: Limestonementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Pretest CA Mean ± STD (°) Post-Test CA Mean ± STD (°) 1L 86.3 ± 2.9 84.7 ± 2.9 87.9 ± 3.5 100.3 ± 0.9 100.9 ± 0.8 99.6 ± 1 2L 85.9 ± 0.5 83.9 ± 0.4 87.9 ± 0. 2021) measured original and varying CAs in Indi limestone using distilled and various saline waters, respectively [73,74], highlighting s stantial variations dependent on the fluid medium. These studies corroborate the se tivity of rock surface wettability to environmental conditions and fluid composition.…”
Section: Limestonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For such reservoirs, enhanced or tertiary hydrocarbon recovery methods are being considered. Such methods include injection of gas or chemicals (e.g., surfactants, polymers, CO 2 ) to alter the surface tension [11,12], rock wettability, and capillary pressures. An effective alteration of the wettability and capillary pressures can significantly improve hydrocarbon recovery from tight reservoir pores that were initially un-swept during secondary recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%