2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the Impact of Storage Conditions on Microbial Community Composition in Soil Samples

Abstract: Recent advances in DNA sequencing technologies have allowed scientists to probe increasingly complex biological systems, including the diversity of bacteria in the environment. However, despite a multitude of recent studies incorporating these methods, many questions regarding how environmental samples should be collected and stored still persist. Here, we assess the impact of different soil storage conditions on microbial community composition using Illumina-based 16S rRNA V4 amplicon sequencing. Both storage… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

13
78
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
13
78
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The recently developed Illumina MiSeq platform can yield more detailed information of microbial community with greater throughput but less cost (Caporaso et al 2012;Nelson et al 2014). Illumina-based sequencing has found applications in characterizing the bacterial community in various natural and man-made environments, such as drinking water biofilter (Liao et al 2014), biofilm on drinking water distribution pipe (Wu et al 2014), anaerobic digestion sludge (Yang et al 2014), tropical rainforest leaf litter , river water (Staley et al 2013), soil (Rubin et al 2013), and mangrove wetland sediment (Jiang et al 2013). In addition, Illumina-based sequencing has also had several applications to characterize archaeal community in natural and man-made environments, such as fluid and sediment at a shallow marine hydrothermal site (Lentini et al 2014), biogas-producing and phenol-degrading bioreactor (Ju and Zhang 2014), and reservoir sediment (Zhang and Huang 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recently developed Illumina MiSeq platform can yield more detailed information of microbial community with greater throughput but less cost (Caporaso et al 2012;Nelson et al 2014). Illumina-based sequencing has found applications in characterizing the bacterial community in various natural and man-made environments, such as drinking water biofilter (Liao et al 2014), biofilm on drinking water distribution pipe (Wu et al 2014), anaerobic digestion sludge (Yang et al 2014), tropical rainforest leaf litter , river water (Staley et al 2013), soil (Rubin et al 2013), and mangrove wetland sediment (Jiang et al 2013). In addition, Illumina-based sequencing has also had several applications to characterize archaeal community in natural and man-made environments, such as fluid and sediment at a shallow marine hydrothermal site (Lentini et al 2014), biogas-producing and phenol-degrading bioreactor (Ju and Zhang 2014), and reservoir sediment (Zhang and Huang 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Illumina/Solexa represents the NGS sequencing system most widely used for amplicon-based metagenomic studies (Luo et al 2012), providing optimal performances in terms of time, costs and coverage (Caporaso et al 2012;Kozich et al 2013;Liu et al 2012;Loman et al 2012;Quail et al 2012). In particular, the Illumina MiSeq benchtop sequencer is very suitable for amplicon-based metagenomic studies, considering its overall features including the obtainable read length up to 300 m. Nevertheless, few available experimental protocols for the ampliconbased metagenomic approach on the MiSeq platform are available involving the application of the TruSeq (Caporaso et al 2012;Gilbert et al 2010;Rubin et al 2013) or a custom designed approach (Kozich et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other biases inherent in molecular approaches to community profiling include the DNA extraction protocol (8) and sample storage conditions (9). For example, frozen samples better maintain alpha diversity and differ least in beta diversity (10). Importantly, low template concentrations may be particularly susceptible to bias due to the increased impact of stochastic processes during PCR (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%