2020 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/aset48392.2020.9118307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the effect of the mechanical and biological properties of designed microporous scaffolds manufactured by commercial 3D printing technology was studied, and the results promoted the use of silica-based 3D printed scaffolds as viable candidates for further research in clinical applications [17,40]. Overall results support this technology providing an excellent technique to fabricate the small mechanical parts providing sufficient precision, which allows rapid modifications to be made during the process itself [41]. Besides, the efficiency of the process can be further improved by utilizing waste PLA as feedstock material, thereby minimizing the leftover waste PLA filaments [4,42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For instance, the effect of the mechanical and biological properties of designed microporous scaffolds manufactured by commercial 3D printing technology was studied, and the results promoted the use of silica-based 3D printed scaffolds as viable candidates for further research in clinical applications [17,40]. Overall results support this technology providing an excellent technique to fabricate the small mechanical parts providing sufficient precision, which allows rapid modifications to be made during the process itself [41]. Besides, the efficiency of the process can be further improved by utilizing waste PLA as feedstock material, thereby minimizing the leftover waste PLA filaments [4,42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, the FFF is an excellent, affordable, traditional technology [ 100 ] that can be incorporated with antimicrobial material with different natural material to produce different engineering components [ 101 , 102 ]. Eventually, using antimicrobial material through the 3D printing technology must be evaluated [ 103 ] to predict the final product properties [ 104 ] as well as to explore the possibilities of the failure while being in service [ 105 ] through experimental investigation, and even could be achieved theoretically through simulation [ 106 ], especially we are dealing with composite reinforced with different types and material of particulates. Eventually, using antimicrobial material could be not feasible from the economic view point especially if used for bulky objects or parts, but antimicrobial material could be efficiently used by using the FFF technology to apply it on the top surface of the object that is potentially subjected to the contamination and this could be optimized using multilayered sandwich components [ 107 , 108 ] to reduce the quantity consumed.…”
Section: Gaps Challenges Opportunities and Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several issues arise during printing, such as increased viscosity and fiber-matrix interface issues. Moreover, it has been observed that there is a lack in the studies related to the impact of implementing different internal 3D printing structures on the mechanical properties [ 80 ] of 3D printed fiber-reinforced composite as well as the influence of the open-source 3D printer [ 81 ] on the quality, consistency and the process capability [ 82 ] of the natural fiber 3D printed composite objects or using hybrid composite 3D printing technology enhanced with hard particles [ 83 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%