2013
DOI: 10.1007/jhep12(2013)089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the near-criticality of the Higgs boson

Abstract: We extract from data the parameters of the Higgs potential, the top Yukawa coupling and the electroweak gauge couplings with full 2-loop NNLO precision, and we extrapolate the SM parameters up to large energies with full 3-loop NNLO RGE precision. Then we study the phase diagram of the Standard Model in terms of high-energy parameters, finding that the measured Higgs mass roughly corresponds to the minimum values of the Higgs quartic and top Yukawa and the maximum value of the gauge couplings allowed by vacuum… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

34
1,824
8
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,159 publications
(1,868 citation statements)
references
References 157 publications
(188 reference statements)
34
1,824
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The most recent analysis of Ref. [16] has shown that the SM scalar potential becomes unstable at a value of Λ well below the Planck scale, if the Higgs boson mass is smaller than 129.6 ± 1.5 GeV. 1 Taken at face value, these results would further imply that we live in a metastable vacuum that will eventually (and catastrophically) decay via tunneling into the true vacuum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most recent analysis of Ref. [16] has shown that the SM scalar potential becomes unstable at a value of Λ well below the Planck scale, if the Higgs boson mass is smaller than 129.6 ± 1.5 GeV. 1 Taken at face value, these results would further imply that we live in a metastable vacuum that will eventually (and catastrophically) decay via tunneling into the true vacuum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Taken at face value, these results would further imply that we live in a metastable vacuum that will eventually (and catastrophically) decay via tunneling into the true vacuum. However, the lifetime of the metastable vacuum is many orders of magnitude larger than the age of the universe [16,17]. On the other hand, if the electroweak vacuum is absolutely stable, then the recent LHC discovery of a 125 GeV SM-like Higgs boson requires the existence of new BSM physics at an energy scale below a scale of Λ 10 9.5 GeV, where there is an uncertainty of about 1 in the exponent due to parametric uncertainties of m t , α s and the Higgs mass [16], in order to avoid the metastability of the SM vacuum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vacuum stability of the SM up to the Planck scale is excluded at 2σ (98% C.L. one sided) for m H < 126 GeV [18][19][20]. The instability of the SM vacuum does not contradict any experimental observation, provided its lifetime τ is longer than the age of the universe T U .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, the devil is in the details. More recent NNLO analyses [18][19][20] On combining in quadrature the theoretical uncertainty with experimental errors on the mass of the top (m t ) and the strong coupling constant (α s ), one obtains m H > 129 ± 1.8 GeV. The vacuum stability of the SM up to the Planck scale is excluded at 2σ (98% C.L.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the possibility that the SM holds at least as a consistent theory up to the scale of quantum gravity (or Planck scale) requires the Higgs potential to not develop instabilities below this scale, which can be triggered by too strong a top Yukawa interaction, which is too heavy a top quark [1]. For such vacuum stability to hold, the measurements of the Higgs mass require the top quark to be lighter than a value that is within a few GeV from the current top quark mass world combination [2][3][4][5][6]. Therefore, a precise measurement of the mass of the top quark is mandatory to discuss the validity of the SM up to the highest energies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%