2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2011.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the role of impoundment and forest structure on the resistance and resilience of mangrove forests to hurricanes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the ratio of mean biomass/ mean rate of biomass increment, Figure 2(d) shows that mangrove forests have the lowest turnover time (27 years) of aboveground biomass among the forest ecosystems, while tropical rain forests and tropical moist deciduous forests present renewal times of 43 and 36 years, respectively. The fast turnover rate of aboveground biomass corroborates the high resilience described for mangroves (Vogt et al 2012), which is, in the view of Alongi (2008), the result of an interaction among factors such as: high nutrient reserves in the substrate; high rates of nutrient flow and microbial decomposition; and the redundancy of key species, although disturbance regimes may also play a role (Duke 2002).…”
Section: Global Averages Of Carbon Stock and Sequestrationsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Using the ratio of mean biomass/ mean rate of biomass increment, Figure 2(d) shows that mangrove forests have the lowest turnover time (27 years) of aboveground biomass among the forest ecosystems, while tropical rain forests and tropical moist deciduous forests present renewal times of 43 and 36 years, respectively. The fast turnover rate of aboveground biomass corroborates the high resilience described for mangroves (Vogt et al 2012), which is, in the view of Alongi (2008), the result of an interaction among factors such as: high nutrient reserves in the substrate; high rates of nutrient flow and microbial decomposition; and the redundancy of key species, although disturbance regimes may also play a role (Duke 2002).…”
Section: Global Averages Of Carbon Stock and Sequestrationsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Increased sampling of transitional areas may yield higher C stock estimates if mangrove seedlings can be found in association with other salt marsh species with higher C stocks. However, the presence of young mangroves is not evenly distributed for all salt marsh species, which may be influenced by altered hydrology due to mosquito control impoundments (Vogt et al 2012). Transitional areas are caused by propagule retention in salt marsh, which varies greatly by species due to structural complexity and stem density (Peterson and Bell 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mangrove forests, the physical damage and level of defoliation varied with distance from the eye walls of the hurricanes , Tomasko et al 2006. Mangrove stands with larger mangrove trees and lower densities sustained greater damage from hurricane winds (Vogt et al 2011). In addition, Proffitt et al (2006) found that, in the first year following the storms, mangrove reproduction was reduced by an order of magnitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further hypothesized that damage and recovery would also vary by species and zone. Although some studies found that susceptibility to hurricane damage varies with species and size of mangrove (Baldwin et al 1995, Imbert et al 1996, McCoy et al 1996, Sherman et al 2001, Vogt et al 2011, others found similar levels of damage among mangrove species and among size classes within species (Odum et al 1982, Gresham et al 1991, Smith et al 1994, Sherman et al 2001. Because mangrove forests are often characterized by low floristic diversity, several studies have predicted that the recovery trajectory is relatively simple such that biological diversity, forest structure, ecosystem processes, and ecological functions will completely regain their former states following hurricane disturbance (Lugo et al 1976, Ogden 1992, Smith et al 1994.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%