Investigating the role of the general practitioner in cancer prevention: a mixed methods study

Abstract

BackgroundDespite evidence of the effectiveness of cancer preventive services and the increasing development of guidelines, actual rates of delivery of cancer prevention activities remain low. Due to their frequent front-line contact with the public, family physicians (GPs) have the potential to play an important role in the primary prevention of cancer. However, there is a lack of information about their actual role in cancer prevention. The aim of this study was to investigate the actual and potential roles of general practitioners (GP) in the prevention of cancer.MethodsA sequential exploratory mixed methods approach was used. The sample included all the General Practice (GP) practices in a region in the UK (n=345). Postal questionnaires were administered to GPs (n=1249); following 290 returns (response rate 23%), semi-structured interviews were undertaken with GPs (n=14).ResultsThe majority of the GP respondents (66.4%, n=184) considered that they routinely provided cancer prevention information. This was specifically focusing on smoking cessation as almost all GPs (96.8%, n=270) enquired about a patient’s smoking status. Overall, 47.2% (n=128) of GP respondents indicated that they felt they did not have time to perform a cancer prevention role; however, 88.3% (n=242) still felt that they had the ‘opportunity’ to do so. Over half the sample (61.3%, n=168) indicated that imposed health priorities and targets militated against providing cancer prevention activities. Almost all the GP respondents (98.9%, n=273) agreed with empowering individuals to take responsibility for their health issues. The GPs identified the need for alternative models for cancer prevention beyond current face to face patient care, including other health and non-health professionals. Whilst lack of time was identified as a critical factor, the GPs indicated that significant efforts were made to encourage patients to take personal responsibility for lifestyle choices.ConclusionsThe GPs indicated a need for training around behavioural change and theories of motivation and action. This has implications for primary care and family physicians worldwide. While doctor–patient consultations and the physicians’ credibility offer great potential for cancer prevention, time pressures and imposed government targets often mean that their actual cancer prevention role is reduced.

What are GPs' preferences for financial and non-financial incentives in cancer screening? Evidence for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers

“…The conclusion holds when we take into account preference heterogeneity. This result is consistent with previous studies that highlighted the need for training (McIlfatrick et al, 2013) and for transmission of information particularly in the context of gynaecological cancers (Liberalotto, 2012).…”

“…These non-financial factors include physicians training, receiving feedback, and assistance from other non-health professionals (McIlfatrick et al, 2013;Sabatino et al, 2008).…”

Impact assessment of a pay-for-performance program on breast cancer screening in France using micro data

“…Thus, non-financial factors are likely to play a significant role in GPs' decisions to provide advice and recommendation for cancer screening [37]. These factors may include physicians training, feedbacks or assistance from other non-health professionals [38,39].…”

The knowledge of selected cancer prevention methods among Polish outpatients

“…to the contrary, a recent British study proved that the provision of cervical screening services to women is largely a routine procedure, with 95.3% of GP respondents promoting it. the majority of GPs (55.3%) also routinely promoted active screening for cancers other than cervical cancers [14]. stefanowicz et al, in their study, asked general practitioners about the role of primary healthcare in cancer prevention.…”