2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the thermal behavior of double-skin perforated sheet façades: Part A: Model characterization and validation procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although empirical validation procedures, based on real metering and auditing data, are considered as very reliable procedures [47], they are often used for the validation of tools and mathematical models developed for simulating specific phenomena. In this regard, the literature shows several examples of such a procedure applied to the validation of models relative to thermally activated building systems [48][49][50], daylighting or HVAC interactions with respect to window or solar gain [51,52], double skin facades or ventilated cavity [53][54][55][56], activities of occupants and their interaction with the building loads [57], etc. It is worth noting that though experimental validations of single mathematical models for the simulation of the energy performance of a specific new building's technology, component or material, can be often easily carried out, the experimental validation of whole BEPS tools is mostly unfeasible.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although empirical validation procedures, based on real metering and auditing data, are considered as very reliable procedures [47], they are often used for the validation of tools and mathematical models developed for simulating specific phenomena. In this regard, the literature shows several examples of such a procedure applied to the validation of models relative to thermally activated building systems [48][49][50], daylighting or HVAC interactions with respect to window or solar gain [51,52], double skin facades or ventilated cavity [53][54][55][56], activities of occupants and their interaction with the building loads [57], etc. It is worth noting that though experimental validations of single mathematical models for the simulation of the energy performance of a specific new building's technology, component or material, can be often easily carried out, the experimental validation of whole BEPS tools is mostly unfeasible.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High precipitation, humidity, and solar radiation make buildings in such location require a durable material which suitable with climate and available resources. Blanco et al (2014) studied perforated sheet metal material in the building under Spain's weather condition. Theoretical model and experiment in the material were carried to examine the behaviour of perforated sheet metal DSF classified by colour, metal material type, and perforation rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grabe (2002) proposed a prediction tool for modelling the temperature´s behaviour and flow characteristics in DSF, and Manz (2002) introduced a numerical algorithm for predicting heat transfer by natural convection in cavities of façade elements. Most recent scientific works are based on computational fluid dynamics models, which allow for detailed airflow study in DSTF, as compared to network or other models (Mingotti et al, 2011;Nore et al, 2010;Blanco et al, 2014). In particular, CFD is an interesting method, especially when dealing with very complicated airflows across venetian blinds, air recirculation, or in cases in which the velocity profile is not symmetrical (Grabe, 2002;Manz, 2002;Zeng et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%