1991
DOI: 10.1109/tim.1990.1032933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the use of multimeters to measure quantized hall resistance standards

Abstract: A new generation of digital multimeters was used to compare the ratios of the resistances of wire-wound reference resistors and quantized Hall resistances. The accuracies are better than 0.1 ppm for ratios as large as 4: 1 if the multimeters a~ calibrated with a Josephson array.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that we are not fully outside the 1/f noise region shows up as a noise floor in the Allan deviation of a large set of ratio measurements starting at averaging times larger than approximately 1 h. This noise floor shows that using these switching procedures we cannot obtain uncertainty better than 10 parts in 10 9 . This is almost one order of magnitude lower than in the early work of Cage et al [14], who used a conventional Josephson setup to determine the linearity of the complete 1 V range. A single linearity measurement took them typically 1 h, which is far into the 1/f noise region of the DVM.…”
Section: Application: Quantum Hall Voltage Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fact that we are not fully outside the 1/f noise region shows up as a noise floor in the Allan deviation of a large set of ratio measurements starting at averaging times larger than approximately 1 h. This noise floor shows that using these switching procedures we cannot obtain uncertainty better than 10 parts in 10 9 . This is almost one order of magnitude lower than in the early work of Cage et al [14], who used a conventional Josephson setup to determine the linearity of the complete 1 V range. A single linearity measurement took them typically 1 h, which is far into the 1/f noise region of the DVM.…”
Section: Application: Quantum Hall Voltage Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The two resistors to be compared are connected in series and a dc current of 45 µA is sent through them. Subsequently, the ratio of the voltages developed over the two resistors is measured [14]. Two HP 3458A DVMs are used in their 1 V range, where each DVM measures the ratio of the voltages over the 10 k resistor and the QHR values of approximately 12.9064 k or 6.4532 k for the i = 2 and i = 4 plateaus, respectively.…”
Section: Application: Quantum Hall Voltage Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combined standard uncertainty for the above measurement results is derived according to the law of propagation of uncertainty given by the ISO/IEC GUM Guide [19] and is described in appendix B. From the results, the main uncertainty factors are the applied voltage, DMM voltage measurement, DMM input resistance and bias current effect, reference resistance, lead wires and temperature effects [20,21]. These uncertainty factors are analyzed in the following, and an uncertainty budget for the factors is estimated as shown in table 3.…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysis and Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input resistance of the DMM was measured using the method described by Cage et al [21] and the value, measured at 23 • C and a relative humidity of 60%, was 1.9(5) × 10 12 . The system leakage resistance was measured to be greater than 3 × 10 13 .…”
Section: Dmm Input Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ADC is part of an auto-calibrating 8.5 digit DMM [142] which is used in the DC voltage mode. These DMMs are known to exhibit non-linearity in voltage of <1×10 -7 [143]. Referring to figure 5.7, the excitation current is sourced directly through the reference resistor R S and the DUT (thermometer) resistance R x and two voltages are measured on the DMM, V R+ and V S+ , which are the potential differences across the unknown and the reference, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%