2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2012.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating transatlantic merger policy convergence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to this study, Szücs (2012) investigates the convergence between US and EU merger policy following the 2004 EU merger policy reform. In particular, he uses a sample of 309 EU and 286 US merger cases scrutinized by DG Comp and the FTC, respectively, between 1991 and 2008.…”
Section: Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to this study, Szücs (2012) investigates the convergence between US and EU merger policy following the 2004 EU merger policy reform. In particular, he uses a sample of 309 EU and 286 US merger cases scrutinized by DG Comp and the FTC, respectively, between 1991 and 2008.…”
Section: Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is argued that the dominance test was deficient in cases of collective dominance and tacit collusion, and that the "substantial lessening of competition" test employed by the United States' Federal Trade Commission (FTC) would be preferable. After the 2004 reform, the test used by the European Commission can be most accurately described as a significant impediment of effective competition (SIEC) test, which is more closely aligned with US practice (Bergman et al, 2007;Szücs, 2012).…”
Section: Institutional Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, not every comparison yields prediction differences. 30 Comparing outcomes with hypothetical or ''adjusted'' outcomes has a long history in the labor economics literature (see, Altonji and Blank 1999) and has been recently applied in comparing merger enforcement policies (e.g., Bergman et al 2010;Szücs 2012). hypothetical rate that would occur were they treated as price markets. For the pooled model, this calculation is implemented by subtracting the contribution of the Price Competition variable from the computed fitted values that are generated by the pooled equation for industries with price competition to define simulations for nonprice industries.…”
Section: Price Versus Non-price Competition Industriesmentioning
confidence: 99%