2019
DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of astrovirus and bornavirus in the cerebrospinal fluid of dogs clinically diagnosed with meningoencephalitis of unknown etiology

Abstract: Background: Non-suppurative encephalitides in a variety of species, including humans and dogs, have been linked to infection by astroviruses and bornaviruses. Hypothesis/Objectives: To determine whether or not ribonucleic acid of astroviruses or bornaviruses was present in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of dogs with clinically diagnosed meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown etiology (MUE). Animals: Twenty-five client-owned dogs evaluated by CSF analysis at a single university referral hospital. Methods: Prospecti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significant difference in MUO prevalence found in our control and MUO groups and our lack of identification of infection through very sensitive techniques in a population highly exposed to L. infantum indicates that it is unlikely that this agent participates in the aetiology of MUO or acts as a trigger event, as described for other agents, such as distemper virus, Toxoplasma gondii , and/or Neospora caninum [ 1 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Although further studies with a larger number of dogs are needed, it should be highlighted that the infectious agent looked for was ruled out in every dog included in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The significant difference in MUO prevalence found in our control and MUO groups and our lack of identification of infection through very sensitive techniques in a population highly exposed to L. infantum indicates that it is unlikely that this agent participates in the aetiology of MUO or acts as a trigger event, as described for other agents, such as distemper virus, Toxoplasma gondii , and/or Neospora caninum [ 1 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Although further studies with a larger number of dogs are needed, it should be highlighted that the infectious agent looked for was ruled out in every dog included in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Among the different triggering factors examined so far are environmental factors and infectious agents as possible activating agents of CNS cells. Notwithstanding, no infectious agent has been isolated in this context [ 1 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings shared here are consistent with previous research reports. In recent research studies, no occult infectious organisms have been identified in dogs with MUO ( 7 , 9 , 10 ) or CNS inflammation ( 5 , 8 ). However, this report expands on published research in several ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most notably, researchers have long hypothesized that MUO has an infectious cause, either directly leading to stimulation of an immune response or triggering autoimmunity ( 3 ). However, to date, an infectious etiology for MUO has not been identified ( 4 10 ). Large numbers of dogs with neurological dysfunction also have been screened for specific infectious agents such as Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato ( 5 ), and Bartonella spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to identify an underlying infectious agent have failed so far. Thus, an autoimmune pathogenesis is suspected [3][4][5][6]. Major factors contributing to the disease are genetic susceptibility and environmental factors [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%