2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of auditory processing disorder and language impairment using the speech-evoked auditory brainstem response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
46
0
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
5
46
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were also observed in a previous study (7) , which observed the responses of children with APD, and demonstrated that 80% of them had abnormal speech-evoked ABR . These data are in accordance with studies that showed a major relationship between deficits in speech-evoked ABR and in auditory perception (6)(7)(8) , and that demonstrated improved speech-evoked ABR response after auditory stimulation (5,9,11) . Based on the observations of the present study, and on the current knowledge about speech-evoked ABR, it is possible to discuss some clinical applications of this potential.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar results were also observed in a previous study (7) , which observed the responses of children with APD, and demonstrated that 80% of them had abnormal speech-evoked ABR . These data are in accordance with studies that showed a major relationship between deficits in speech-evoked ABR and in auditory perception (6)(7)(8) , and that demonstrated improved speech-evoked ABR response after auditory stimulation (5,9,11) . Based on the observations of the present study, and on the current knowledge about speech-evoked ABR, it is possible to discuss some clinical applications of this potential.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In Brazil, speechevoked ABR has been studied for approximately 10 years, and has only a few publications (2)(3)(4)(5)(6) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Direct comparisons between the ABR and FFR have revealed that they are differentially sensitive to stimulus presentation rate (Krizman et al, 2010), frequency specificity (Picton et al, 1977, p. 105), their susceptibility to noise masking (Ananthanarayan and Durrant, 1992;Cunningham et al, 2002;Russo et al, 2004), and how their latency changes with stimulus intensity (Akhoun et al, 2008a). Moreover, speech-evoked brainstem responses may be impaired in children with languageand learning-disorders (Banai et al, 2007(Banai et al, , 2009Basu et al, 2010;Rocha-Muniz et al, 2012) despite normal click-ABRs (Song et al, 2006). Together with our new findings, these studies support the growing body of evidence which suggests that onset and sustained portions of the human brainstem response are generated by distinct portions of the auditory system (Worthington and Peters, 1980) and originate from separate neuroanatomical populations along the pathway (e.g., Krizman et al, 2010;Parthasarathy and Bartlett, 2012;Picton et al, 1978;Ross et al, 2002).…”
Section: Dissociation Between the Onset Abr Response And Sustained Ffrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the stimulated ear, the great majority of studies performed the assessment of ABR with speech stimuli elicited only on the right ear, which can be explained by the advantage of right ear in encoding speech by contralateral projection to the left hemisphere [24,26,29,31,32,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Stimulated Earmentioning
confidence: 99%