“…This kind of benefit is based on a partial or complete recovery of both the as-irradiated nanostructure and the mechanical properties of the RPV material. In this context, studies of the annealing behavior formed the basis to identify optimum post-irradiation annealing regimes in terms of temperature and time (Popp et al, 1989) (e.g., 475 °C/152 h for VVER-440 reactors) or to demonstrate the success of realized high-temperature dry annealings (Pelli and Törrönen, 1998;Viehrig et al, 2009). Alternatively, less demanding and more cost-efficient procedures such as low-temperature (e.g., 343 °C) wet annealing within the RPV design limits (Pelli and Törrönen, 1998;Krasikov, 2012) might give rise to partial recovery possibly allowing for some limited but worthwhile lifetime extension.…”