2019
DOI: 10.2478/s11686-018-00017-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Dientamoeba fragilis Prevalence and Evaluation of Sociodemographic and Clinical Features in Patients with Gastrointestinal Symptoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
18
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to our results, there were also significantly higher prevalence rates (> 20 percent) in several regions of the world, including countries from Europe, Middle East, and South America [27][28][29]. The common symptoms associated with D. fragilis infection were diarrhea, abdominal pain and vomiting, in agreement with the literature [30][31][32][33]. None of the Dientamoeba-positive patients, in our study, gave history of fever or reported blood or mucous in feces.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In comparison to our results, there were also significantly higher prevalence rates (> 20 percent) in several regions of the world, including countries from Europe, Middle East, and South America [27][28][29]. The common symptoms associated with D. fragilis infection were diarrhea, abdominal pain and vomiting, in agreement with the literature [30][31][32][33]. None of the Dientamoeba-positive patients, in our study, gave history of fever or reported blood or mucous in feces.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In this specific subset, 4.4% of the samples were positive to D. fragilis by microscopy, meaning that qPCR was at least 2-fold more sensitive than conventional microscopy (10.4 vs 4.4%) in detecting the presence of the parasite. Similarly, D. fragilis has been previously identified by microscopy in 3.3% of children with diarrhoea in Ankara (Maçin et al ., 2016), and by qPCR in 2–12% of patients with gastrointestinal symptoms in Izmir and Kayseri (Sivcan et al ., 2018; Aykur et al ., 2019). Taken together, these findings are in favour of implementing diagnostic algorithms based on PCR methods for the detection of enteric protists in clinical settings, as previously recommended (Verweij, 2014; Van Lieshout and Roestenberg, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D. fragilis was detected as the most common parasite species in faecal samples of studied population (27). Similarly, frequency of D. fragilis was studied in patients with GI symptoms and 23.7% of D. fragilis positives had Blastocystis infection (28). The most common protozoon was D. fragilis in Blastocystis infected individuals, 24% (53 of 221 Blastocystis infected cases).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%