2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10035-015-0595-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of dynamics simulation of granular particles using spherocylinder model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we do not compute the projection of the single constituent beads, which defines a set of filled circles on the plane i-j. Instead, for simplicity, we approximate the complex multisphere particles by intersecting spherocylindrical shells [38], and we compute A and P from the projection of these shells on the plane i-j. As an example, the perimeter P and the area A obtained from the projection of particle #8 (the cross) is shown on the bottom of table 1.…”
Section: Particle Shapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we do not compute the projection of the single constituent beads, which defines a set of filled circles on the plane i-j. Instead, for simplicity, we approximate the complex multisphere particles by intersecting spherocylindrical shells [38], and we compute A and P from the projection of these shells on the plane i-j. As an example, the perimeter P and the area A obtained from the projection of particle #8 (the cross) is shown on the bottom of table 1.…”
Section: Particle Shapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the aim of the present analysis is to quantify the main geometric characteristics influencing the particle's rotational behavior, that is the degree of non-sphericity of the multisphere particle shapes, which is why we choose the shape parameters listed above. Moreover, we note that previous DEM simulations using spherocylinders have been presented in [38]. However, here we adopt the multisphere method in the simulations as it leads to an efficient computation of particle-particle contact detection, while with the generated multisphere particles it is possible to capture the main characteristics associated with the rotational behavior of the different modeled shapes.…”
Section: Particle Shapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the parameter α depends on the shape of contact area and is determined to be 0.974 by Kidokoro et al Parallel cylinder–cylinder contact: Fnc=italicκπLc2()1.8864+italiclnLnormalc2bEnormalc1ν2δn …”
Section: Triaxial Compression Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two contact scenarios exist for the fiber–wall contacts: parallel contact and inclined contact. In the present simulations, different contact force models are used for different contact types, in order to account for the difference in contact forces, as discussed in the previous work . The Mindlin model is used for the tangential contact forces.…”
Section: Triaxial Compression Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These different cases imply that assuming a constant contact stiffness may not be reasonable for spherocylindrical particles. Recent work by Kidokoro et al did account for the varying stiffnesses associated with these various contact geometries but did not account for transitions. Prior experience by the current authors has shown that an abrupt change in force can occur if a contact transitions from one type to another, with a corresponding abrupt and unrealistic acceleration of the contacting particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%