2018 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EIConRus) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/eiconrus.2018.8317121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of electromechanical parameters of IPMC-sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fu et al (2018) showed that an IPMC sample manufactured by plasma etching the polymer and magnetron sputtering the electrodes generates close to 200 mV output in response to 1.6% bending strain, being 63 times higher than an electroless-plated IPMC [156]. In 2018, Khmelnitskiy et al studied characteristics of IPMC voltage sensing both in air and in water environment using Pt-coated IPMCs with Nafion 117 membrane in Cu2+ cation form [129]. Sensitivity drop was reported at frequencies around 20 Hz and above, and authors argued that it is caused by slow motion of liquid within the polymer membrane.…”
Section: Active Sensing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Fu et al (2018) showed that an IPMC sample manufactured by plasma etching the polymer and magnetron sputtering the electrodes generates close to 200 mV output in response to 1.6% bending strain, being 63 times higher than an electroless-plated IPMC [156]. In 2018, Khmelnitskiy et al studied characteristics of IPMC voltage sensing both in air and in water environment using Pt-coated IPMCs with Nafion 117 membrane in Cu2+ cation form [129]. Sensitivity drop was reported at frequencies around 20 Hz and above, and authors argued that it is caused by slow motion of liquid within the polymer membrane.…”
Section: Active Sensing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak voltage was shown to be approximately proportional to the bending angle for bending rates of 45–90° s1, and voltage rise rate proportional to the bending rate [126]. Typical amplitudes of the voltage response remain in milli-volt range [97], e.g., 2.06 mV/mm (quasi-static) [97], 0.04 mV/mm (5 Hz) [125], 0.125 mV/mm (2 Hz) [106], 0.15 mV/mm (5 Hz) [118], and 0.072 mV/mm (10 Hz) [129]. Nemat-Nasser and Li showed by modelling and experimental data that the amplitude of IPMC sensing voltage is two orders of magnitude smaller than the voltage that is required to produce the same deformation in actuation [68].…”
Section: Active Sensing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The calculated sensitivity is S = 47.6 ± 2.0 mV mm −1 after amplification (G = 100) and 0.476 mV mm −1 without amplification, which can be compared to the value found by Khmelnitskiy et al (0.072 mV mm −1 without amplification). The authors used a standard IPMC with Nafion 117 [41], showing lower flexibility than our IPMC because of its inherent thickness, which can explain the difference of sensitivity. We also investigated the repeatability by performing the measurements with the same sample after 6 months of storage in water.…”
Section: Sensing Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%