2017
DOI: 10.3390/aerospace4040059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Numerical Dissipation in Classical and Implicit Large Eddy Simulations

Abstract: Abstract:The quantitative measure of dissipative properties of different numerical schemes is crucial to computational methods in the field of aerospace applications. Therefore, the objective of the present study is to examine the resolving power of Monotonic Upwind Scheme for Conservation Laws (MUSCL) scheme with three different slope limiters: one second-order and two third-order used within the framework of Implicit Large Eddy Simulations (ILES). The performance of the dynamic Smagorinsky subgrid-scale mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Gaussian integration, in which the surface normal gradient was specified by a limiter for the nonorthogonal correction, was used for the diffusion term (specified as "laplacianSchemes {Gauss linear limited 0.333;}"). Although assessing the numerical schemes for the accuracy of the simulation is attractive, the numerical dissipation from the second-order central difference scheme for the convective term [25] is also a valuable topic, but it is to be explored in further studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Gaussian integration, in which the surface normal gradient was specified by a limiter for the nonorthogonal correction, was used for the diffusion term (specified as "laplacianSchemes {Gauss linear limited 0.333;}"). Although assessing the numerical schemes for the accuracy of the simulation is attractive, the numerical dissipation from the second-order central difference scheme for the convective term [25] is also a valuable topic, but it is to be explored in further studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the code, a 2 nd -order scheme has been implemented to solve the flow in the circumferential direction; however, the decision of which EAR to use is not straight-forward. As far as Euler equations is concerned, the literature on the topic of quantitative measurement of numerical diffusion is very scarce, some limited literature exists for Navier Stokes equation [26,27]. Furthermore, while methods are available to calculate analytically the truncation error of a scheme due to interpolation [28], there is no study on the effect of the presence of a Riemann solver on the truncation error.…”
Section: Solver Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring the numerical dissipation is inherently difficult and we restrict the discussion here on the symptoms such as reduced accuracy and increased oscillatory behaviour. It should be noted, however, that first promising results were published by El Rafei et al [59] who computed the numerical dissipation directly through the modified equation analysis for the complete set of Navier-Stokes equations. Despite the reduced accuracy, the number of iterations were reduced for some cases up to 14% compared to a non Rusanov Riemann solver treatment.…”
Section: Flow Inside a Lid-driven Cavity At Sub-critical Reynolds Nummentioning
confidence: 99%