2016
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2016.2543139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Prediction Accuracy, Sensitivity, and Parameter Stability of Large-Scale Propagation Path Loss Models for 5G Wireless Communications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
318
1
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 405 publications
(364 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
8
318
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Another popular path loss model is the floating-intercept (FI) model, which is used in the WINNER II and 3GPP standards [13]. This model is not a physically based model; however, it is suitable for some bands and environments, where the floating-intercept ( ) parameter is close to the FSPL at 1 m and the slope line ( ) is comparable to the PLE.…”
Section: Path Loss Models Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another popular path loss model is the floating-intercept (FI) model, which is used in the WINNER II and 3GPP standards [13]. This model is not a physically based model; however, it is suitable for some bands and environments, where the floating-intercept ( ) parameter is close to the FSPL at 1 m and the slope line ( ) is comparable to the PLE.…”
Section: Path Loss Models Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some measurements have been conducted by New York University (NYU) in the 28 GHz and 73 GHz frequency bands in a typical indoor office environment [13][14][15][16]. Three large-scale propagation path loss models for use over the entire microwave and mmWave radio spectrum, namely, the alpha-beta-gamma (ABG) model, the close-in (CI) free space reference distance model, and the CI model with a frequency-weighted path loss exponent (CIF), were studied and compared for the bands from 2 to 73 GHz with different frequency bands [13]. Moreover, indoor measurements for wireless and backhaul communications have been conducted in the frequency band of 72 GHz [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find that the 0 = 1 m close-in (CI) free space reference path loss model is a simple physically based one-parameter PLE model [35,36], which is more stable across frequencies and environments than the traditional floating-intercept (FI) least-squares regression equation line. The fixed-intercept is given as…”
Section: Path Loss Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For instance, the prediction accuracy, sensitivity and stability of different PL modeling options for 5G wireless communications have been addressed in [11]. However, the modeling method is still an open issue in 5G wireless communications.…”
Section: A Path Loss Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%