2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of retention of gases in transverse hydrophobic microgrooved surfaces for drag reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiment was done with a high-speed water tunnel, which is a closed circulation system, as shown in Figure 7(a) [17,18]. Water was driven by the pump and firstly flowed through the antirevolving part, which primarily prevented the revolving of the flow.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The experiment was done with a high-speed water tunnel, which is a closed circulation system, as shown in Figure 7(a) [17,18]. Water was driven by the pump and firstly flowed through the antirevolving part, which primarily prevented the revolving of the flow.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test section of the water tunnel can measure the friction force of the sample directly [18] as shown in Figure 7(b). The sample was located at the middle of the tunnel and was supported through the center axle.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Hydrodynamic drag reduction by such intact gas layer on textured superhydrophobic surface is a topic of intense current research interest. [4][5][6][7] It is a dynamic analogue of the non-wetting Cassie-Baxter state of water on superhydrophobic surfaces 8,9 that stimulated recent studies on the combined effects of surface wettability and the Leidenfrost phenomenon. 3,[10][11][12] Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter mechanism is particularly important for surfaces subjected to turbulent flow. Entrapped gas was observed on various rough and structured surfaces that were immersed in water under static conditions (Bobji et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2014), and the periods of retention of air were compared showing a high dependence of surface structure and the mean time for the air trapped to disappear, ranging from approximately 35 minutes for surfaces with pillars and 25 minutes for surfaces with ridges (Bobji et al, 2009), to 1 hour for micro-grooved surfaces (Wang et al, 2014). Super-hydrophobic surfaces with ridges have been shown to retain air pockets for more than 8 hours under very small static water pressure of 50 mm (∼ 490 Pa), where the main factor to maintain the Cassie-Baxter state was the minimized environmental fluctuations such as no variation in temperature (Xu et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%