2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.04.035
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of sandstone erosion by continuous and pulsed water jets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, experiments previously carried out at the optimal standoff distance and the results obtained are somewhat questionable. In previous studies [ 19 , 25 ], standoff distance was determined using the incline trajectory, where the vertical component of velocity ( v y = v.sinα mm/s) was neglected. This resulted in the decrement in the actual velocity ( v = v PWJ − v y ) of the PWJ, leading to reduction in the impact force.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, experiments previously carried out at the optimal standoff distance and the results obtained are somewhat questionable. In previous studies [ 19 , 25 ], standoff distance was determined using the incline trajectory, where the vertical component of velocity ( v y = v.sinα mm/s) was neglected. This resulted in the decrement in the actual velocity ( v = v PWJ − v y ) of the PWJ, leading to reduction in the impact force.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous studies [ 8 , 10 , 19 , 25 ] that have been reported in Table 1 used stationary or inclined trajectory movement of the PWJ head to determine the optimal standoff distance corresponding to the maximum depth of disintegration. However, in the present article, a new methodology in the form of staircase trajectory movement has been used to include the vertical component of the traverse speed ( v y = v ·sin α mm/s; α is the angle of inclination of the inclined path), which was omitted in the previous studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sevda and Hood [8] studied the internal breaking ability of rock under pulsed water jet impact. Piush et al [9] measured the depth, width, and volume of sandstone eroded by continuous water jet and pulsed water jet. Rupam et al [10] studied the surface morphology of granite impacted by continuous water jet and pulsed water jet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the high energy consumption and low efficiency of the traditional waterjet limited its application. To make better use of waterjet technology and lower its energy consumption, various kinds of waterjets have been invented, such as the pulsed waterjet [6,7], abrasive waterjet [8], cavitating waterjet [9,10], and so on. As environmentally friendly technologies, the pulsed waterjet can take advantage of the water hammer effect [11], and the cavitating waterjet can harvest the energy of cavity collapse [9,12]; both of them can significantly lower the energy consumption during the working process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%