2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of slope failure mode evolution during large deformation in spatially variable soils by random limit equilibrium and material point methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the random material point method (RMPM, see Wang et al 2016a;Liu et al 2019;Remmerswaal et al 2021) initially proposed by Fenton and Vanmarcke (1990) to generate RFs for a finite element mesh (RFEM), we combined this approach with the codes proposed by Räss et al (2019b) to generate an isotropic peak cohesion field to demonstrate its influence on the mechanical behaviour.…”
Section: Appendix C: Volumetric Locking and Damping Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the random material point method (RMPM, see Wang et al 2016a;Liu et al 2019;Remmerswaal et al 2021) initially proposed by Fenton and Vanmarcke (1990) to generate RFs for a finite element mesh (RFEM), we combined this approach with the codes proposed by Räss et al (2019b) to generate an isotropic peak cohesion field to demonstrate its influence on the mechanical behaviour.…”
Section: Appendix C: Volumetric Locking and Damping Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate estimates of soil and rock properties only contribute to the accuracy of predicted response of geotechnical structures, e.g., the predicted settlement of foundations. On the other hand, the spatial variability of ground properties exists long before the project and affects significantly the actual response of geotechnical structures (e.g., Fenton and Griffiths 2002;Wang et al 2011;Liu et al 2019). The knowledge uncertainties and spatial variability, therefore, should be differentiated in probabilistic analyses.…”
Section: Uncertainty Propagation During Ground Property Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, side resistance of a pile foundation is a summation of unit pile side resistance along a pre-specified surface (i.e., the interface between the pile shaft and soils). However, the SRV model may not perform well when variation of spatial coordinates of the ground properties is important, such as slope stability analysis (e.g., Griffiths and Fenton 2004;Liu et al 2019) where a search for the minimum resistance path is needed from a large number of potential slip surfaces. In these cases, RF modeling of spatial variability, with explicit consideration of spatial coordinates, is preferred.…”
Section: Physical Meaning Of Single Random Variable Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continuous methods describe material behavior using macroscopic constitutive equations of mechanical, hydraulic, and thermal-mechanical behaviors. In addition to FEM, smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) [16,17], the material point method (MPM) [18,19], and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) [20][21][22] are popular continuous methods used in landslide simulation. As for the discontinuous methods, the discrete element method (DEM) [23][24][25][26][27] and discontinuous deformation analysis (DDA) [28,29] are most used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%