2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-017-3467-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the ‘double cross’ splitting mechanism of single-crystal diamond under nanoindentation via molecular dynamics simulation

Abstract: Elucidating the mechanical response of diamond is a difficult task due to its ultrahard nature. Here, we applied a molecular dynamics (MD) method to investigate the mechanical response of single-crystal diamond under nanoindentation. There was no obvious "pop in" phenomenon on the load-depth curve, and the elastic modulus deduced from the curve was 1128 GPa, which was similar to the value obtained from experimental measurements. Results from computed tomography (CT) and the coordination number showed that the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MD simulation was performed on Ni using the many-body tight-binding potential method to perform nanoindentation for evaluating Young's modulus and hardness values [26]. Indentation of SiO2/Si bilayer composite is studied to determine the stress relaxation behavior using MD simulations [27]; The mechanical properties of single-crystal diamonds were also determined using molecular dynamics during nanoindentation using MD simulations [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MD simulation was performed on Ni using the many-body tight-binding potential method to perform nanoindentation for evaluating Young's modulus and hardness values [26]. Indentation of SiO2/Si bilayer composite is studied to determine the stress relaxation behavior using MD simulations [27]; The mechanical properties of single-crystal diamonds were also determined using molecular dynamics during nanoindentation using MD simulations [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%