1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0518(19990615)37:12<1847::aid-pola14>3.0.co;2-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the effect of type and concentration of ionizable comonomer on the collapse behavior ofN-isopropylacrylamide copolymer gels in water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further insights into gel swelling can be gained by considering the Flory–Huggins interaction parameter (χ). Previously, it was reported that χ for PNIPAm/water varies from 0.5 to 0.65 , and that for PNIPAm/methanol, χ is ∼0.45–0.46. , The value of χ for the poly­(NIPAm- co - y % MABP)/methanol system was determined experimentally by measuring the second virial coefficient ( A 2 ) from static light scattering measurements. The experimentally derived values range between 0.46 and 0.47, revealing that methanol is a good solvent for poly­(NIPAm- co - y % MABP) at all MABP mole fractions (see Figure c,d), and therefore the gels swell more in methanol than in water (χ PNIPAm/water = 0.56–0.99).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further insights into gel swelling can be gained by considering the Flory–Huggins interaction parameter (χ). Previously, it was reported that χ for PNIPAm/water varies from 0.5 to 0.65 , and that for PNIPAm/methanol, χ is ∼0.45–0.46. , The value of χ for the poly­(NIPAm- co - y % MABP)/methanol system was determined experimentally by measuring the second virial coefficient ( A 2 ) from static light scattering measurements. The experimentally derived values range between 0.46 and 0.47, revealing that methanol is a good solvent for poly­(NIPAm- co - y % MABP) at all MABP mole fractions (see Figure c,d), and therefore the gels swell more in methanol than in water (χ PNIPAm/water = 0.56–0.99).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The swollen gels were removed from the solvent and blotted with a P5 filter paper to remove the excess solvent and immediately weighed with an accuracy of 0.1 mg until the weight variation was <0.5%. Equation describes an estimation of the swelling ratio for bulk gels. , Similarly, SE was used to measure the swelling of surface-anchored hydrogel films in solvent vapor. For water, the sample was placed in a completely sealed chamber, where the relative humidity (RH) of air was controlled using saturated salt solutions of KOH (RH < 50%) and K 2 S0 4 (RH > 50%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%