1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1993.tb00816.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the “Hangover” Effects of an Acute Dose of Alcohol on Psychomotor Performance

Abstract: Performance on some complex and difficult tasks has been shown to be negatively affected for some time after an acute dose of alcohol has been cleared from the system. However, Dauncey reported impairment of a relatively simple reaction time task 3 hr after a dose of alcohol, when the blood alcohol concentration was at or near 0. This impairment was positively related to the subject's drinking history. A replication using the same task found a linear dose/impairment relationship during intoxication. A second s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with a previous study that also applied the Mackworth clock test (Lemon et al, 1993), the difference between the two groups was not significant in the morning session. Figure 2 illustrates that alertness in the placebo condition was significantly increased in the morning session.…”
Section: Memory Functioning and Vigilance Test Performancesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In line with a previous study that also applied the Mackworth clock test (Lemon et al, 1993), the difference between the two groups was not significant in the morning session. Figure 2 illustrates that alertness in the placebo condition was significantly increased in the morning session.…”
Section: Memory Functioning and Vigilance Test Performancesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Confusingly, some studies reported significant psychomotor performance impairment (Takala, 1958;Kelly et al, 1970;Seppälä et al, 1976;Bonte and Volck, 1978;Myrsten et al, 1980;Laurell and Törnros, 1983;Yesavage and Von Leirer, 1986;Roehrs et al, 1991;Yesavage et al, 1994;Anderson and Dawson, 1999), whereas other studies did not (Carroll et al, 1964;Ideström and Cadenius, 1968;Dowd et al, 1973;Collins and Chiles, 1980;Collins, 1980;Morrow et al, 1990;Törnros and Laurell, 1991;Lemon et al, 1993;Chait and Perry, 1994;Streufert et al, 1995;Taylor et al, 1996;Finnigan et al, 1998). Taking into account that the majority of participants in these studies did report hangover symptoms, the inconclusive results are rather unexpected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hangover may also produce psychomotor performance decrements that could increase risk for accidental injury or death when operating a motor vehicle or engaging in other potentially dangerous activities (cf. Chait and Perry, 1994;Cherpitel et al, 1998;Finnigan et al, 1998;Lemon et al, 1993;Myrsten et al, 1980;Yesavage and Leirer, 1986). Hangover may also have prognostic significance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemon et al (42) found no impairment on a divided attention task 12 h after intoxication (0.083 g% mean BAC). Chait and Perry (43) found no evidence of impairment on a battery of behavioral tasks the morning following heavy drinking.…”
Section: Residual Effects Of Alcohol On Neurobehavioral Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 98%