2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00303-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the morphology of internal defects in cross wedge rolling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
53
0
13

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
53
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 18 further shows the stress triaxiality counters at the mid cross-section at various rolling times. As is seen in the figure, the crack propagates to the mid cross-section at 0.52 s and elongates in a direction normal to the maximum stress triaxiality at 0.68 and 0.8 s. The above-explained phenomenon of crack formation also quite well agrees with the experimentally observed crack formation in the knifing and guiding zones in cruciform shapes propagating through the direction of the maximum principal stress in CWR [8].…”
Section: Failuresupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Figure 18 further shows the stress triaxiality counters at the mid cross-section at various rolling times. As is seen in the figure, the crack propagates to the mid cross-section at 0.52 s and elongates in a direction normal to the maximum stress triaxiality at 0.68 and 0.8 s. The above-explained phenomenon of crack formation also quite well agrees with the experimentally observed crack formation in the knifing and guiding zones in cruciform shapes propagating through the direction of the maximum principal stress in CWR [8].…”
Section: Failuresupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This point was specifically chosen because it is known to be the location for void and crack initiation. It should also be mentioned that only the stress and strain in the knifing and guiding zones were considered because the void initiation is known to occur by the end of the guiding zone [16].…”
Section: The Finite Element Failure Stress Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since strain is a measure of the intensity of deformation, it is logical that it will be a more accurate predictor of void initiation than stress. In addition, in a prior experimental work by the authors [16], a deformation coefficient was introduced to predict the likelihood of a void formation. The deformation coefficient is given by:…”
Section: The Finite Element Strain Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O defeito que apresenta maior ocorrência nesse processo é a formação de cavidades ou vazios no interior dos produtos como representado na Figura 1. Esse tipo de defeito também é conhecido como "efeito Mannesmann", tendo grande importância no processo já que pode se estender por toda a região da peça acarretando em perda de resistência do produto, podendo levar a sua ruptura [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified